Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 319
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307
Judgment
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal. Present:- Mr.Arvind Seth, Advocate for Mr.Deepak Arora-I, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.AS Brar, DAG Punjab. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J.(ORAL) Though the name of the petitioner was mentioned in the F.I.R., however, after investigation no challan was presented against him and he was shown in column No.2. Subsequently, the petitioner was summoned on an application by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. vide order dated
13.8.2007 to face trial with the other accused under Section 307/34 IPC. The order passed by the trial Court summoning the petitioner is extracted as below: “Addl. PP for the state filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. dor summoning Baldev Singh as an additional accused who has been specifically named by Tarsem Lal PW in his statement recorded on oath in the Court as one of the assailants also. I have gone through the statement of PW Tarsem Lal and application of the prosecution. Baldev Singh son of Nazar Singh resident of Tehang is ordered to be summoned as additional accused to face trial with the present accused under 307/34 IPC for
Operative part
12.9.2007.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of order passed by this Court on 21.9.2008, he has already furnished the bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Keeping in view the above said facts, the order dated 21.9.2008 is made absolute. Crl. Misc. No.46085-M of 2007 -2- The petition is disposed of accordingly. February 15,2008. Reema ( RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 319; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 15 Feb 2008. The bench was RAJESH BINDAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.