Abhimanyu Goswamy v. U.T. Administration
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In view of this, present petition is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate
Operative part
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in a case FIR No. 242 dated 24.7.2010 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh. This Court vide order dated 30.8.2010 has granted interim bail in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated that with the efforts of Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, parties have arrived at amicable settlement. In view of this, present petition is allowed. Order dated
30.8.2010 is made absolute.
01.02.2011 (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of this, present petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 01 Feb 2011. The bench was ALOK SINGH.