Smt. Sulochn v. Sunil Kuma
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 12 Dec 2024
- Bench
- NIDHI GUPTA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Smt. Sulochn ulochna @ Babli .... Respondent CORAM: H M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH NIDHI GUPTA Present: - None. NIDHI GUP I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed und led under 482 Cr.P.C. is for setting aside/quashi quashing of impugned order dated 1) dated 03.12.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by th by the learned Principal Judge, Famil Family Court, Narnaul, in Criminal Petition No. n No. MNT 182/2015/2019, CIS No .O.I. IS No. MNT-125-15-2019, D.O.I.
10.12.2015/0 2015/06.09.2019 titled as ‘Smt. Sulo vs. . Sulochna @ Babli and others vs. Sunil Kuma Kumar’, whereby preliminary enquir P.C. enquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. rdered. was ordered. The matter pertains to the year n is e year 2021 and notice of motion is yet to be iss be issued in the same. Perusal of the of the order-sheets shows that vide order dated dated 25.01.2021, passed by a co- ourt, -ordinate Bench of this Court, learned coun d counsel for the petitioner had sough d an sought time to place on record an affidavit of t vit of the petitioner on the basis of whi of which proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. r.P.C. were initiated. Thereafter, vide 024, r, vide last order dated 09.04.2024, passed by th by this Court, at the request of learn ner, f learned counsel for the petitioner, last opportun portunity was granted to do the needfu needful. RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.13 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-250 2508-2021 - -2- As per office report, no affidav affidavit has been furnished by the petitioner til ner till date. Today, a written request for st for an adjournment has been circulated b ted by learned counsel for the pe the petitioner on the ground that ‘undersigned igned counsel has to attend frie friend’s son marriage, kindly accommodat odate’. In view of the above, no gro no ground is made out to further adjourn the c n the case for the said purpose. ution. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, s any, shall also stand disposed of. 2024
12.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.13 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 340.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Dec 2024. The bench was NIDHI GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.