Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Petitioner Hazara Ram has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to register a criminal case against respondents No.4 to 12 on the basis of complaint made by him, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and going through the contents of the petition as well as the complaint, Annexure P-2, I am not inclined to exercise the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as in my opinion, the petitioner has alternative remedy, as has been held by this Court in Mithlesh Kumari v. State of Punjab, 2002 (4) RCR (Criminal) 541 and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre v. State of Maharashtra and others, (2004) 7 SCC 768 and Minu Kumari and another v. State of Bihar and others, (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 359. Dismissed. September 12, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Sep 2006. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.