08.2012 Balwinder Singh & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 30 Aug 2012
- Bench
- PARAMJEET SINGH
Outcome
Allowed
The present petition is allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: - Mr. HPS Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Goyal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, for complainant-respondent No.3. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) This petition has been moved by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of case FIR No.197
9.3.2012 Sections 415/463/464/465/467/474/196/203/209/211/406/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Karnal City, on the basis of compromise in the form of affidavit dated 24.2.2012 sworn by the complainant Ved Parkash (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion was issued on 31.7.2012 and parties were directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal, on
Operative part
13.8.2012 to record their respective statements with regard to compromise and learned Magistrate was directed to submit its report. It is contended that in pursuance of order dated 31.7.2012, the parties have appeared before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal and got recorded their statements. Certified copies of the statements of Crl. Misc. No. M-22741 of 2012 (O&M) -2- complainant Ved Parkash and the accused have been produced in Court, which are taken on record. The statements indicate that the parties appeared before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and recorded their respective statements admitting the validity of compromise, and that it has been entered into voluntarily. As per the statements, the complainant has compromised the matter with the petitioners. Now no dispute is pending between the parties. Consequently, in view of compromise (Annexure P-2) and keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Crl) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation. The present petition is allowed. FIR No.197 dated 9.3.2012 under Sections 415/463/464/465/467/474/196/203/209/211/406/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Karnal City, along with all consequential proceedings arising out of it, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2), is quashed. August 30, 2012 R.S. (Paramjeet Singh) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 30 Aug 2012. The bench was PARAMJEET SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.