✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 28 Sep 2010

Amandeep Singh v. State of Punjab

NIRMALJIT KAUR

Case at a glance

Decided
28 Sep 2010
Bench
NIRMALJIT KAUR

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case…

Judgment

CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Dharminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. S.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant. *****

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

Operative part

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.75 dated 07.06.2010 registered under Sections 452, 325, 324, 323, 336, 506, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Dehlon, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from SI Jagdeep Singh, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no more required by the police. It is further stated that the weapon of offence has also been recovered. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order dated 13.08.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute.

28.09.2010 gurpreet (NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 336, 452, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Sep 2010. The bench was NIRMALJIT KAUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments