CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-19151 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 18 & Ors. v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 452
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.H.K. Aurora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of son-in-law of petitioner No.1, alleging that his wife Kamaljit Kaur had taken all the gold ornaments while leaving the petitioners besides giving beating to the complainant. Crl. Misc. No.M-19151 of 2011 [2] All the offences except for offence under Section 452 IPC are bailable. The FIR appears to be of a matrimonial dispute between the daughter of petitioner No.1 with the complainant. In peculiar circumstances of this case, the petition can be allowed. Ordered accordingly. In case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to all the conditions enumerated under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. July 18, 2011 sanjay (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 452; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 Jul 2011. The bench was M M S BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.