Neha Thakur & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Neelam, A.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.34 dated 5.3.2010 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC Police Station Adampur, Jalandhar. Since vide order of even date passed in Crl. M. No.9563-M of 2010 FIR in question has already been quashed on the basis of compromise, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
29.4.2011 rajeev ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 29 Apr 2011. The bench was NIRMALJIT KAUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.