✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 05 Mar 2024

Dinesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Cwp No. 5226 of 2024AMAN CHAUDHARY

Case at a glance

Decided
05 Mar 2024
Bench
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Neutral citation
2024:PHHC:30973

Outcome

Disposed of

the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the aforesaid and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 15.11.2023 (Annexure P9) and if any other representation is filed within 4 weeks…

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Dr. Puneet Kaur Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J

1.

The prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the pay anomaly and step up the pay of the petitioners.

2.

Learned counsel would submit that the petitioners have been granted Rs.1900/- as increment on account of 1st ACP, prior to 01.10.2011, while their juniors, who completed 4 years of service after the said date, got Rs.3200/- and thus, leading an anomaly has occurred. In this regard, a representation dated

15.11.2023, Annexure P9, has been submitted by them, which has yet not evoked any response. She thus, at this stage, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are sanguine of it being considered in a positive manner, in case, a direction is given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner by granting them an opportunity of hearing. She also submits that the petitioners would bring to the notice of the authorities the facts supported by documents demonstrating that the first representation was submitted on the portal.

4.

Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made. ASHOK KUMAR 2024.03.06 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5226-2024 (O&M) -2-

Operative part

5.

In view of the aforesaid and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 15.11.2023 (Annexure P9) and if any other representation is filed within 4 weeks from today, within a period of 6 months and if found entitled, necessary benefit be granted to them forthwith. However, in the eventuality of the relief being denied, a speaking order be passed, after associating them therewith.

05.03.2024 ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2024.03.06 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Mar 2024. The bench was AMAN CHAUDHARY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cwp No. 5226 of 2024). ← Search more judgments