IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR v. STATE TRANSP
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
the present petition is dismissed for w
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Pending application(s), if any, also sta Pend lso stands disposed of accordingly. (K (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE
Judgment
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI S RTI SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Non njab. Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, AAG, Punjab. Ms. KIRTI SINGH, J GH, J. (ORAL)
Despite calling twice, none has put Desp as put in appearance on behalf of th of the petitioner. The sam he same situation prevailed on the prev e previous date of hearing as well i.e. o i.e. on
Operative part
13.07.2026. There There appears to be no inclination to a etition. n to actively pursue the present petition In these circumst rcumstances, this Court is unable to p e to proceed further for the purpose o pose of hearing of the pre he present petition and left with no othe o other option except to dismiss the wr the writ petition for want o want of prosecution. Therefore, the pre the present petition is dismissed for w of prosecution.
However, liberty is granted to the p How the petitioner to move an appropriat ropriate application for se for seeking revival of the present wri nt writ petition with the preparation t ation to argue the matter atter within four weeks from today, i oday, in case any substantive issue sti exists.
Pending application(s), if any, also sta Pend lso stands disposed of accordingly. (K (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE
20.08.2026 SwarnjitS SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.08.20 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/reasoned Whet Whether reportable Whet : : Yes / No Yes / Yes / No Yes / SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.08.20 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.