✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 27 Sep 2011

Sukhraj Singh @ Kala v. State of Punjab

CRM-M No. 17331 of 2011AJAY TEWARI

Case at a glance

Decided
27 Sep 2011
Bench
AJAY TEWARI

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the complainant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.30 dated 14.05.2011 registered under Section 406 IPC at Police Station Phul, District Bathinda. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that actually on 02.09.2011 the petitioner had handed over a sum of Rs.1.15 lakhs but inadvertently it had been recorded as Rs.1.50 lakhs. Learned counsel for the complainant has accepted this factual assertion. CRM-M No.17331 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: In view of the payment that has been made by the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. September 27, 2011 ashish ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 438, 438(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 406.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Sep 2011. The bench was AJAY TEWARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 17331 of 2011). ← Search more judgments