✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Dheeraj v. State of Haryana

CRM-M No. 15459 of 2011AJAY TEWARI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 31 dated 22.01.2011, under Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station Urban Estate, Rohtak. Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Satpal, has stated that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required. In the circumstances I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In case he is arrested, he shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. August 02, 2011 sunita ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 420; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 15459 of 2011). ← Search more judgments