OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (286) CRM-M-9136-2024 Date of Decision:-March 21 & Ors. v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 148, 149, 427, 458
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No.0127 dated
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Bhatta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Anil K. Sokal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
#1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.0127 dated 29.05.2023 under Sections 458, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Sadar Mansa (Annexure P-1), and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise/statement dated
16.09.2023 (Annexure P-4).
#2. Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, this Court vide order dated 20.02.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 14.03.2024 has been received from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mansa, PARUL 2024.03.23 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document -2- CRM-M-9136-2024 stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue influence.
#3. Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis.
#4. Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal proceedings in such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner.
#5. Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No.0127 dated
29.05.2023 under Sections 458, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Sadar Mansa (Annexure P-1), and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners jointly and Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited by respondent No.2 within one month from today in Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
#6. It is made clear that, in case, the respondent No. 2 tries to force the petitioners to deposit the cost or does not deposit the cost imposed on PARUL 2024.03.23 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document -3- CRM-M-9136-2024 him, the petitioners are at liberty to make an appropriate application for passing appropriate orders against respondent No. 2 for initiation of separate proceedings against them. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE March 21, 2024 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Whether Reportable:- Yes/No Yes/No PARUL 2024.03.23 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 427, 458.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 21 Mar 2024. The bench was ALOK JAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.