✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Judgment · High Court

Fao No. 1250 of 2025SUDHIR SINGH, SUKHVINDER KAUR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty af Dism erty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also Pendi all also stand disposed of. , 2025 February 21, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/rea ing/reasoned: table: Whether reportable: MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity…

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR CORAM: HON HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHV HON HIR SINGH KHVINDER KAUR ….Appellan pellant ….Responden ondent Present:- Ms. K Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate for appell appellant. ***** SUDHIR SINGH CM-3703-CII-202 2025 NGH, J. (ORAL) For the reasons stated in application, sa For th tion, same is allowed. Delay of 33 day in re-filing the appe e appeal is condoned. CM-3704-CII-202 2025 For the reasons stated in application, sa For th tion, same is allowed. Delay of 469 day in filing the appeal appeal is condoned. &M) Main case (O&M) After arguing for some time, learn After , learned counsel for appellant seek permission to with o withdraw the present appeal with lib ith liberty to move an application unde Order IX Rule 13 le 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, dure, 1973, before the Court of learne learned Additional Princip rincipal Judge, Family Court, Amritsa ex- mritsar, seeking setting aside of the ex parte order dated ated 03.01.2024, passed by the said Co said Court.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty af Dism erty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also Pendi all also stand disposed of. , 2025 February 21, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/rea ing/reasoned: table: Whether reportable: MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment Yes/No Yes/No (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 1 of of 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Fao No. 1250 of 2025). ← Search more judgments