Criminal Misc. No. M-10530 of 2010 v. State of Haryana & Anr.

BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) In this petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought a direction for entrustment of the case to an independent agency. The petitioners have stated in the petition that they do not expect fair and proper investigation at the hands of local police and thus investigation of the case be handed over to an independent agency. Learned State counsel, however, submits that investigation in the case has already been completed and challan has been presented before the competent court. According to him, all the petitioners have been found guilty in the investigation. He further submits that thorough investigation was conducted into the matter by an officer of the level of Deputy Superintendent of Police. He, thus, submit that apprehension that investigation has not been fair and proper is without any basis. Heard. Criminal Misc. No. M-10530 of 2010 2 In view of the stand taken by the State before this court, it is evident that during the pendency of the case investigation has been competed and challan presented before the competent court of jurisdiction. There is nothing on record to show that investigation has not been fair and impartial. I am, thus, of the considered view that no interference is called for in inherent jurisdiction of this court. The petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed. September 21, 2011 Ajay (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE