03.2026 M/S KRBL Limit Limited v. STATE OF PUNJ PUNJAB NTS & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
he present writ petition is disposed of wi
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, at this stage, without com Acco case, ut commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is ition is disposed of with a direction to re cision to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representati sentation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure…
Judgment
CORAM : HON HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA B HON PAK SIBAL ITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate, Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Mr. Raghav Gupta, Advocate for the pe Mr. R the petitioner. Mr. r. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punja , Punjab. DEEPAK SIBAL IBAL, J. (Oral) * * * * *
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner subm Lear uld be r submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the pres he present writ petition is disposed of wi 3- of with a direction to respondent No.3 Assistant Excise xcise and Taxation Commissioner, San n the er, Sangrur to take a decision on the representation date dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-5), sub ), submitted by the petitioner.
Learned State counsel, who appears on Lear ection ars on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer prayer is accepted.
Accordingly, at this stage, without com Acco case, ut commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is ition is disposed of with a direction to re cision to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representati sentation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P er, by ure P-5) submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speakin peaking order and after granting oppor fected opportunity of hearing to all affected parties and in acc in accordance with law, preferably wi ate of ly within three days from the date of receipt of a copy o copy of this order.
Needless to add that the decision so Need to the on so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if th d if the decision is not to the satisfactio be at sfaction of the petitioner, it would be at liberty to challenge allenge the same, in accordance with law ith law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE Yes / No Whether reportable [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No :
18.03.2026 Prince PRINCE SAINI 2026.03.19 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/reasone easoned :
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: he present writ petition is disposed of wi
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 Mar 2026. The bench was DEEPAK, LAPITA B, DEEPAK SIBAL IBAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.