✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalandhar on 11.05.2009 vide which the order convicting the respondent/accused passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar had been set aside and the respondent had been acquitted in a complaint case registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred as ‘NI Act’). AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh AMIT KAUNDAL 2025.06.12 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments