✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 02 Jul 2026

YOGESH v. STATE OF HARYANA

AAG HARYANA, SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Allowed. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed.

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana. Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) ***

1.

As per custody certificate, placed on record by learned State counsel, appellant has undergone the sentence of three years under Section 411 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not wish to prosecute the appeal further and may be permitted to withdraw the same.

Operative part

5.

Allowed. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed.

02.07.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : Yes/No Yes/No (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 411.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 02 Jul 2026. The bench was AAG HARYANA, SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments