✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 13 May 2025

IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA v. LPA-671-2025 (O&M)

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Dismissed as withdraw with liberty af Dism erty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall al Pend shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 13, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/r king/reasoned: rtable: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.16 12:19 I…

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR CORAM: HON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK J HON DHIR SINGH OK JAIN Present:- Mr. Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advoca dvocate for the appellant. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG Pu Ms. AG Punjab. ***** SUDHIR SINGH CM-1717-LPA- -2025 INGH, J. (ORAL) Heard. Hea For the reasons stated in the applicat For ay of pplication, same is allowed. Delay of 10 days in filing t filing the appeal is condoned. Main case (O&M (O&M) After arguing for sometime, learned Afte arned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to wit to withdraw the present appeal with li with liberty to file review application against the impug impugned order.

#3. Dismissed as withdraw with liberty af Dism erty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall al Pend shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 13, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/r king/reasoned: rtable: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.16 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Lpa No. 671 of 2025). ← Search more judgments