✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 20 Dec 2012

Civil Revision 7728 of 2012 v. Satyawan

T P S MANN

Case at a glance

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. G.S.Brar, Advocate T.P.S. MANN, J.(Oral) The defendant has filed the present revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for challenging the order passed by the trial Court on 6.10.2012 whereby its application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was dismissed. Admittedly, the plaintiff has come to the Court of law by way of a suit for rendition of accounts. He has not disputed his signatures appearing upon the agreement executed between him and the defendant at the time of advancement of the loan. However, when sufficient information was not provided to him by the defendant, the plaintiff had no other option but to knock the doors of the Court by filing a suit for rendition of accounts. It is apparent from the notice issued by the defendant on 11.9.2006 CR 7728 of 2012 -2- that an amount of Rs. 4,89,567/- was payable by the plaintiff. Similarly, 10 days thereafter another notice was sent by the defendant showing outstanding amount Rs.4,76,000/-. Nine months later, another notice was issued by the defendant showing an amount of Rs. 98,830/- as due and payable by the plaintiff. The aforementioned three notices themselves indicate that the defendant is not itself clear regarding the amount which it has to recover from the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff was justified in filing a suit for rendition of accounts. At the same time, he could not be forced to attend the arbitration proceedings at Kolkata after leaving his native village in Hisar district of the State of Haryana. In view of the above, there is no merit in the revision which is, accordingly, dismissed. December 20, 2012 ajay-1 ( T.P.S. MANN ) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 8.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 20 Dec 2012. The bench was T P S MANN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments