✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 25 Feb 2010

Civil Revision No25 v. Duni Chand and ot hers

Civil Revision No. 25 of 2010ARJ CCTSINGH ADDIT IONAL CIVIL JUDGC SENIOR, DIVISIONLSIRSA10 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
25 Feb 2010
Bench
ARJ CCTSINGH ADDIT IONAL CIVIL JUDGC SENIOR, DIVISIONLSIRSA

Provisions considered

Judgment

89 p9 Civil Revision No25 of 2010 1 I N TI I E HI GH COURr OF PUNJAB ce HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Civil Rcvision No25 I Oecidcd on25 220 10 0f 2010 Pct it ioncr Madan Lal Versus Duni Chand and ot hers CORAM2 HONBLE MR JUSTI CE KC PURI Present l Mr NShrkhawat Mr Vivck Suri Advocat c for t he Advocat c lor t he pet it ioncr No1 KCPUR1 Je Thc pct it ioncrhas Olcd t his pct it ionundcr Art iclc 227 oft he Const it ut ion of I ndia for sct t ingasidc t hc ordcr dat cd 242009 lnexure p 11 passed by Sh Am arj cctSingh Addit ional Civil Judgc Senior DivisionlSirsa and t hc j udglncntdat cd 20 12010 lnncxrc P31 passcdby Sh NK 1 Biriwal Addit ional Dist rict Judgc I asl rack Court Sirsa wherebyt he applicalionundcr Ordct 39 Rulcs 1 and 2 read wit h Scct ion 151 of t he Codc of Civil Procedurc in short t hc CPCl Olcd by t hc was dism isscd Thc bricf fact s of t hc casc t hat t hc lllcd a 1 0 C I C5 I a5 7 t l Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh suit for perm anentinj unct ionin t he Court of Civil Judgc6SeniorDivisionl claim ingt hat hc was a t cnant r t he suit land nlcasuring12 kanals 2 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 90 Civil Revision No25 of 2010 2 inarlas sit uat ed n villageChat t argarhPat t i Tchsil and Dist rict Sirsa The pct it ionerI plaint iffhad purchascd6 kanals 1 m arlas of land for which m ut at ionNos 2245 2631 2632 and 2633 wcre dulysanct ioned in favour of t he Thc was recordedlll of t hc cnt irc 12 kanals 2 lnarlas of I and part lyas owncr of t hc half share and part lyas t enanl over t hc rclnaininghalf share in for t he ycars 199495 The sold out his over 6 kanals l m arlaofland ic half share oft he ent ire khewat of 12 kanals 2 m arlas of I and and also handed t he of half sharcof t hc aforcsaid 12 kanals 2 inarlas of I and and as a consequence t hereof at prescntt he is recorded t o be in half shareas a t cnant and t he rcm aininghalf sharc is shown t o be rccorded undert he posscssionof Sit a Ram as Muni Ram and RughaRam were carlier rccordcd as owncrs of t hc said I and in t hc for t he 0 C I 0 I 2 I c6 O 7 years200405 I I owcver Muni Ram had dicd on 1781993 and r1 No 1 t o 4 arc his four sons Sim ilarlyRughaRam dicd in t hc year 1964 and his heirs becam cowncrs of 114 sharc in equal shares Kedar Nat h one of t he legal t hrce sons of RughaRaln also dicd on 103001 and his No 5 t o 7 in t hc suit Raj endcrKuinar No8 claim s him selt o bc nearrclat ion NoI t o 7 Thc suit I and falls ncar t hc abadi arca and wit h a vlCw t o prolcct his cropst hc pct it ioncrand his son werc gct t inga boundary wall const ruct cd on t he spot for bet t cr t hc I and Whcn t he rcspondent s t hrcat encdt o int crfcrc in t hc oft hc Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh land t he SUit for pcrm ancntinj unct ionwas fllcd wit h a prayer t o rest rain t hc suit JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 91 1 rCivil Revision No25 2010 3 e t hc respondent sfrom int crfcring I nt o t hc posscssionof t he t he halfsharc in t he suit land ineasuring12 kanals 2 inarlas Wit h t hcsc broad avennent s t hc plaint was fllcd in t hc Court of Civil Judgc6ScniorDivisionl Sirsa On not ice plcadcdt hat t hc neverrcm ainedin in any capacit yin t hc suit land m casui 12 kanals 2 inarlas l I owevcr in para No 2 it was adlnit t cd t hat t he had purchascdI and lneasuring6 kanal 1 lnarlas bcing half sharc of t hc suit land 1I owcvcr it was st at edt hc pet it ionrlplaint iffiI S not in of any speciOcport ion01 t hc land incasuring12 kanals 2 inarlasand t hc was onlyt hc cosharer in t hc t ot al I and 12 kanals 2 m arlas alongwit ht hc I t Was wronglyst at edt hat t hc land was lying vacant for t he last 35 ycars and t he suit land was Gair Muinkin 1 0 0 I 0 I Z Q Z 08 m I t has bccn allcgcd t hat bot h t hc Court s bclow coinplct cly Qm ovcrlookcdt hc docum cnt s on record and t hc set t lcd I aw Thc Civil Judge him self adlnit t cd t hat t he Jam abandisfor t hc ycar 199495 and 1992000 speak about t hc t he pet it ioncrupon t hc suit propcrt y St ill furt her for t he ycars 200546 also I cads t o t hc fact t hat t he pet it ionerhad alicnalcd half share of t hc land in qucst iont o onc Sit a Ram The for t hc ycars 19995999JOO 200405 spcakt hat t he land is Barani St ill furt her it was obscrvcd lhat t enancyhas bccn shown as Bat aeTihai lhe copy of Khasra Girdawri for t hc pcriodwc0 199495 t o 200708 shows t hat t hc land wlas vacant and not hingwas sown t he t cnancysceincd in qucst ionand t hc 11 Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t herein JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at t ached Wr re n e e 92 rs Civil Rcvision N0925 of 2010 eV 4 1 1 0 0 I C9 I I 08 7 Qw wit h t he rebut t ed ln fact t he said obscrvat ions were cont rary t o t hc record Thc land in qucst ionI S sloown t o bc Maj rua Silnplybccausc of t he fact t hat t hc land has been shown t o bc Baranidoes not m ean t hat t hc t enancycould not havc bccn exist ed on such land St ill furt hcr t he Girdawrisfor t hc said land in 199495 clearly show t hat m ust ardcrop was SOW11 andsonlet iinest hc ot hcr crops werc also sowll Thc pet it ionerlS of t he Khasra Girdawris of t hc said I and whichclearlyrcvealst hat t he crops havc bccn sown froin t iine t o t im c Evcn at prescnt t he lnust ard crop has bccn sown t hc suil I and and lhe oft he pet it ioncrover t hc suit I and haloc bccn anncxed herewit h as Annexure P4 dism isscdt hc Thc t rial Courl aft cr hcaringt hc I carncdcounscl for t hc part ies hc appcal applicat ionvidc ordcr dat cd 241 009 by t hc pct it ioncragainstt hc ordcr dat cd 241 009 was dism issedbyt he learncd Addit ional Dist rict Judgc1ast rack Court Sit sa Fcelingdissat isflcd wit h t hc aforcsaid ordcrs of t hc Couit s bclow t hc t his Ccolilt 1 have hcard I earncd counscl I or t hc part iesand havc gonc t hrought hc rccords oft hc casc Thc I carncd counscl for t hc rcvisionist has subm it t cd t hat bot h t he Court s below havc m isunderst oodand t hc docum cnt ary evidcnce on t hc fllc Thc rcvisionist has bcen shown t o bc in posscssionof t he suit propert yast enant I n fact t hclot all and is 12 kanals 2 m arlas out of which six kanals onc Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh lnarI a I and t vas olvned by t hc revisionist and t hat JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document land has bcen sold by hiin hercaft cr t hc is st ill I ll e4n 93 1 r Civil Revision No25 P of 2010 5 e l t of six kanals and one lnarla of land as t cnant Bot h t hc Court s bclowhavc siinplydcclined t hc inj unct ionon t he groundt hat in t hc khasra t he I and in disput ehas bccn shown barani I t is cont endedt hal t hc suit I and has no sourcc of irrigat ion 1lc sam c i s sown as and when 1 t hercis a rain I n soine oft hc khasragirdwariscrop has bccn shown So 0 C3 I C5 I a5 o 7 Z 0a bot h t he Court s bclow havc coI nm it t cd grave crror lll disallowingt he for lnj unct ion Counscl for lhc rcspondcnlhas support cdlhe j udgm cntof t he t rial Court I t is subinit t edt hat arc owncrs of t he suit propcrt y vcn const ruct ionhas bccn raiscd Plaint iff ncvcr reinaincd in posscssion of t hc propcrt y Ot hcnvise also in t hc khasra girdwarit he I and has bcen shown t o bc not sown l or t hc I ast so m any ycars So t he would be dccm ed t o be t hat of owncr in rcspcctof vacant The praycr has bccn lnadc for dislnissingt hc rCV1SlOll pct lt lOll I havc and I lavealso gonc t hroughbot h t hc ordcrs passcdby t he Court s bclow gonc t hrought hc records of t he casc Bot h t hc Courls bclow rclyingupon lhc khasra girdwari rcached t o t hc conclusion t hat I and is lying vacant and in rcspcctof vacant I and t he owncr of t hc land would bc dccm cd t o havc bccn in Counsel for t hc rcvisionist has placcdOll flle t hc copicsof t hc khasra girdwariand froin t hc pcrusalof t hc sainc is rcvcalcd t hat from Rabbi 1996onwards in 1 t h9chasragirdwaricsSUll I and is lylt l vacant I t is not disput cdby t he I carnedcounscl lor t hc rcvisionist t hat rcvisionist has I A 1 Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh haI f share of t hc propcrt y which has lalcr on sold byhiln JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I t 1S I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document also not en4 owncrsoft hc rcm aininghalfsharc of P 94 J Civil RevisionNo925 of 2010 6 t he landie six kanals onc m arla I t is sct llcd principlcsof law t hat a vacant I and wou I d bc dccm cd t o bc in O t hc ClWnCr SO in t hcsc t hc lcarncd bot h t hc Court s bclow havc right lyhcld t hat st ray ent rics showingt hc oft hc rcspcctof half t m share of I and m casuringt wclvc kanals t wo m arlas do not provc t he 0 0 C5 m 2 I c6 CL of pct it ioncr I I owcvcr t hc fact rcinains t hat from 1996 t ill 2008t hc I and has bccn shown t o bc layingvacanl So no inj unct loncan be issuedagainstt hc t rue owncr So ln VlCW of t hc abovc discussiot l t hc rcvision pct it ion by t he pct it ionerhas no m crit and t hc sam c st andsdism isscd I I owcvcr not hingst at cdhcrcinabovc shall havc any aOcct on t hc m erit soft he inain case A copy of t his udglncntbc scnt t o t hc t rial Court for st rict Februar2S4 2010 SV 1 1 JUDGE Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 25 of 2010). ← Search more judgments