Civil Revision No25 v. Duni Chand and ot hers
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Feb 2010
- Bench
- ARJ CCTSINGH ADDIT IONAL CIVIL JUDGC SENIOR, DIVISIONLSIRSA
Provisions considered
Judgment
89 p9 Civil Revision No25 of 2010 1 I N TI I E HI GH COURr OF PUNJAB ce HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Civil Rcvision No25 I Oecidcd on25 220 10 0f 2010 Pct it ioncr Madan Lal Versus Duni Chand and ot hers CORAM2 HONBLE MR JUSTI CE KC PURI Present l Mr NShrkhawat Mr Vivck Suri Advocat c for t he Advocat c lor t he pet it ioncr No1 KCPUR1 Je Thc pct it ioncrhas Olcd t his pct it ionundcr Art iclc 227 oft he Const it ut ion of I ndia for sct t ingasidc t hc ordcr dat cd 242009 lnexure p 11 passed by Sh Am arj cctSingh Addit ional Civil Judgc Senior DivisionlSirsa and t hc j udglncntdat cd 20 12010 lnncxrc P31 passcdby Sh NK 1 Biriwal Addit ional Dist rict Judgc I asl rack Court Sirsa wherebyt he applicalionundcr Ordct 39 Rulcs 1 and 2 read wit h Scct ion 151 of t he Codc of Civil Procedurc in short t hc CPCl Olcd by t hc was dism isscd Thc bricf fact s of t hc casc t hat t hc lllcd a 1 0 C I C5 I a5 7 t l Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh suit for perm anentinj unct ionin t he Court of Civil Judgc6SeniorDivisionl claim ingt hat hc was a t cnant r t he suit land nlcasuring12 kanals 2 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 90 Civil Revision No25 of 2010 2 inarlas sit uat ed n villageChat t argarhPat t i Tchsil and Dist rict Sirsa The pct it ionerI plaint iffhad purchascd6 kanals 1 m arlas of land for which m ut at ionNos 2245 2631 2632 and 2633 wcre dulysanct ioned in favour of t he Thc was recordedlll of t hc cnt irc 12 kanals 2 lnarlas of I and part lyas owncr of t hc half share and part lyas t enanl over t hc rclnaininghalf share in for t he ycars 199495 The sold out his over 6 kanals l m arlaofland ic half share oft he ent ire khewat of 12 kanals 2 m arlas of I and and also handed t he of half sharcof t hc aforcsaid 12 kanals 2 inarlas of I and and as a consequence t hereof at prescntt he is recorded t o be in half shareas a t cnant and t he rcm aininghalf sharc is shown t o be rccorded undert he posscssionof Sit a Ram as Muni Ram and RughaRam were carlier rccordcd as owncrs of t hc said I and in t hc for t he 0 C I 0 I 2 I c6 O 7 years200405 I I owcver Muni Ram had dicd on 1781993 and r1 No 1 t o 4 arc his four sons Sim ilarlyRughaRam dicd in t hc year 1964 and his heirs becam cowncrs of 114 sharc in equal shares Kedar Nat h one of t he legal t hrce sons of RughaRaln also dicd on 103001 and his No 5 t o 7 in t hc suit Raj endcrKuinar No8 claim s him selt o bc nearrclat ion NoI t o 7 Thc suit I and falls ncar t hc abadi arca and wit h a vlCw t o prolcct his cropst hc pct it ioncrand his son werc gct t inga boundary wall const ruct cd on t he spot for bet t cr t hc I and Whcn t he rcspondent s t hrcat encdt o int crfcrc in t hc oft hc Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh land t he SUit for pcrm ancntinj unct ionwas fllcd wit h a prayer t o rest rain t hc suit JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 91 1 rCivil Revision No25 2010 3 e t hc respondent sfrom int crfcring I nt o t hc posscssionof t he t he halfsharc in t he suit land ineasuring12 kanals 2 inarlas Wit h t hcsc broad avennent s t hc plaint was fllcd in t hc Court of Civil Judgc6ScniorDivisionl Sirsa On not ice plcadcdt hat t hc neverrcm ainedin in any capacit yin t hc suit land m casui 12 kanals 2 inarlas l I owevcr in para No 2 it was adlnit t cd t hat t he had purchascdI and lneasuring6 kanal 1 lnarlas bcing half sharc of t hc suit land 1I owcvcr it was st at edt hc pet it ionrlplaint iffiI S not in of any speciOcport ion01 t hc land incasuring12 kanals 2 inarlasand t hc was onlyt hc cosharer in t hc t ot al I and 12 kanals 2 m arlas alongwit ht hc I t Was wronglyst at edt hat t hc land was lying vacant for t he last 35 ycars and t he suit land was Gair Muinkin 1 0 0 I 0 I Z Q Z 08 m I t has bccn allcgcd t hat bot h t hc Court s bclow coinplct cly Qm ovcrlookcdt hc docum cnt s on record and t hc set t lcd I aw Thc Civil Judge him self adlnit t cd t hat t he Jam abandisfor t hc ycar 199495 and 1992000 speak about t hc t he pet it ioncrupon t hc suit propcrt y St ill furt her for t he ycars 200546 also I cads t o t hc fact t hat t he pet it ionerhad alicnalcd half share of t hc land in qucst iont o onc Sit a Ram The for t hc ycars 19995999JOO 200405 spcakt hat t he land is Barani St ill furt her it was obscrvcd lhat t enancyhas bccn shown as Bat aeTihai lhe copy of Khasra Girdawri for t hc pcriodwc0 199495 t o 200708 shows t hat t hc land wlas vacant and not hingwas sown t he t cnancysceincd in qucst ionand t hc 11 Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t herein JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at t ached Wr re n e e 92 rs Civil Rcvision N0925 of 2010 eV 4 1 1 0 0 I C9 I I 08 7 Qw wit h t he rebut t ed ln fact t he said obscrvat ions were cont rary t o t hc record Thc land in qucst ionI S sloown t o bc Maj rua Silnplybccausc of t he fact t hat t hc land has been shown t o bc Baranidoes not m ean t hat t hc t enancycould not havc bccn exist ed on such land St ill furt hcr t he Girdawrisfor t hc said land in 199495 clearly show t hat m ust ardcrop was SOW11 andsonlet iinest hc ot hcr crops werc also sowll Thc pet it ionerlS of t he Khasra Girdawris of t hc said I and whichclearlyrcvealst hat t he crops havc bccn sown froin t iine t o t im c Evcn at prescnt t he lnust ard crop has bccn sown t hc suil I and and lhe oft he pet it ioncrover t hc suit I and haloc bccn anncxed herewit h as Annexure P4 dism isscdt hc Thc t rial Courl aft cr hcaringt hc I carncdcounscl for t hc part ies hc appcal applicat ionvidc ordcr dat cd 241 009 by t hc pct it ioncragainstt hc ordcr dat cd 241 009 was dism issedbyt he learncd Addit ional Dist rict Judgc1ast rack Court Sit sa Fcelingdissat isflcd wit h t hc aforcsaid ordcrs of t hc Couit s bclow t hc t his Ccolilt 1 have hcard I earncd counscl I or t hc part iesand havc gonc t hrought hc rccords oft hc casc Thc I carncd counscl for t hc rcvisionist has subm it t cd t hat bot h t he Court s below havc m isunderst oodand t hc docum cnt ary evidcnce on t hc fllc Thc rcvisionist has bcen shown t o bc in posscssionof t he suit propert yast enant I n fact t hclot all and is 12 kanals 2 m arlas out of which six kanals onc Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh lnarI a I and t vas olvned by t hc revisionist and t hat JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document land has bcen sold by hiin hercaft cr t hc is st ill I ll e4n 93 1 r Civil Revision No25 P of 2010 5 e l t of six kanals and one lnarla of land as t cnant Bot h t hc Court s bclowhavc siinplydcclined t hc inj unct ionon t he groundt hat in t hc khasra t he I and in disput ehas bccn shown barani I t is cont endedt hal t hc suit I and has no sourcc of irrigat ion 1lc sam c i s sown as and when 1 t hercis a rain I n soine oft hc khasragirdwariscrop has bccn shown So 0 C3 I C5 I a5 o 7 Z 0a bot h t he Court s bclow havc coI nm it t cd grave crror lll disallowingt he for lnj unct ion Counscl for lhc rcspondcnlhas support cdlhe j udgm cntof t he t rial Court I t is subinit t edt hat arc owncrs of t he suit propcrt y vcn const ruct ionhas bccn raiscd Plaint iff ncvcr reinaincd in posscssion of t hc propcrt y Ot hcnvise also in t hc khasra girdwarit he I and has bcen shown t o bc not sown l or t hc I ast so m any ycars So t he would be dccm ed t o be t hat of owncr in rcspcctof vacant The praycr has bccn lnadc for dislnissingt hc rCV1SlOll pct lt lOll I havc and I lavealso gonc t hroughbot h t hc ordcrs passcdby t he Court s bclow gonc t hrought hc records of t he casc Bot h t hc Courls bclow rclyingupon lhc khasra girdwari rcached t o t hc conclusion t hat I and is lying vacant and in rcspcctof vacant I and t he owncr of t hc land would bc dccm cd t o havc bccn in Counsel for t hc rcvisionist has placcdOll flle t hc copicsof t hc khasra girdwariand froin t hc pcrusalof t hc sainc is rcvcalcd t hat from Rabbi 1996onwards in 1 t h9chasragirdwaricsSUll I and is lylt l vacant I t is not disput cdby t he I carnedcounscl lor t hc rcvisionist t hat rcvisionist has I A 1 Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh haI f share of t hc propcrt y which has lalcr on sold byhiln JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I t 1S I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document also not en4 owncrsoft hc rcm aininghalfsharc of P 94 J Civil RevisionNo925 of 2010 6 t he landie six kanals onc m arla I t is sct llcd principlcsof law t hat a vacant I and wou I d bc dccm cd t o bc in O t hc ClWnCr SO in t hcsc t hc lcarncd bot h t hc Court s bclow havc right lyhcld t hat st ray ent rics showingt hc oft hc rcspcctof half t m share of I and m casuringt wclvc kanals t wo m arlas do not provc t he 0 0 C5 m 2 I c6 CL of pct it ioncr I I owcvcr t hc fact rcinains t hat from 1996 t ill 2008t hc I and has bccn shown t o bc layingvacanl So no inj unct loncan be issuedagainstt hc t rue owncr So ln VlCW of t hc abovc discussiot l t hc rcvision pct it ion by t he pct it ionerhas no m crit and t hc sam c st andsdism isscd I I owcvcr not hingst at cdhcrcinabovc shall havc any aOcct on t hc m erit soft he inain case A copy of t his udglncntbc scnt t o t hc t rial Court for st rict Februar2S4 2010 SV 1 1 JUDGE Bat ra Am it 15: 28 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.