I NTHE HI GHCOURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA v. None

he has preparedroughsit e plan on 15294 but his version st ands falsifiedby PW2 Shri Raj Kum ar who has adm it t edin his cross exam inat ion t hat on 15284 t he policehas recorded t he st at em ent of Sm t Veena Rani and excepther exam inat iont he policedid not do any ot her work This fact also cast s doubt in t he prosecut ionversion 1 1 do not see any illegalit yI n t he j udgm ent Dism issed 181999 Sdle L Judge Anandl A perusalof sect ion 401 of CrPC reveals t hat a revisionai Court can also exercise t he powers of a Court of appeal Once t he j udgm entof acquit t alhas been upheldby t his Court in appealagainst acuit t al t his Court shall refrain from ANI TA RANI 2014.12.24 14: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh any ot her opinionas it JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 23 r Crim inalAppealNoe812SBAof 1999 will not onlycause j udicialem barrassm entbut ot herwisealso t he High Court beingone Coun can exercise once only t o a Judgeof t hisCourt t en years ago t herewas no in t he im pugned j udgm entTherefore t his Coun is const rainednot t o form ulat eany differentopinion I n view of t his no int erferenceis warrant ed and t he present appealis dism issed 2 Kt 2009 KANWALJI T S 4GHAHLUWALI Aj JUDGE OJ 1 0 m r 0 C I 0 I Z 2 r I 08 V2 Z I l ANI TA RANI 2014.12.24 14: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document