✦ High Court of India · 08 Mar 2010

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB 8 HARYANA v. St at e of Haryana

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Mar 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Mar 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
1,281 words

1 have heard t he learned counsel for t he part iesand have JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document . um a 15: 12 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh gonet hrought he recordsoft he case 57 0 CL 0 0 I C5 I Z r I 08 QO 3 Z CrleRevneNO1441 of2003 3 ofMirchi Powder t aken byt he Governm entFood from accusedhiv Charan was found adult erat edby t he Public Analystwhich provedt hat t he sam pI eof Mirchi Powder was found t o be adult erat edas t he sam e was cont ainingnce st archand colour wit h added red oil soluble coalt ar dyeThe provisionsof Sect ion of t he Act were coinpliedwit h in t his case The accused while being exaininedunder Sect ion 313 of t he Code of Crim inal Procedure had not t aken t he st and inform ed t he Court regarding norreceiptof t he report of t he Public AnalystThe Governm ent Food deposedt hat as per provisionsof Sect ion 13629of t he Act t he copyoft he result oft he Local Healt h Aut horit yalongwit h let t er was sent t hrough post t o t he accused PW Ram SinghClerk speciflcallydeposedt hat t he accused was let t er ExX and t he post alreceiptin t his regard1 inform ed t hroughforwarding ExY Thus t he accused cannot be said t o have been on t his score The prosecut ioncase has been by t he evidence of 1j a Singh t he Qm Govem m ent Food I nspect or6PH and DrPKGandhi Medical Ofcer PW2l The salnplewas t aken by t he Govem m ent Food l nspect orTej a Singh00W in t he presenceof DrPKGandhi oM The wit nesses had no enm it ywit h t he accused t o falselyim plicat ehim lll t his case The evidence producedby t he clearlyprovest hat t he sam pleof Mirchi Powder m eant for publicsale was seized from t he accused which was sent t o t he Public AnalystHaryana analysiswho vide reportExE found t he sam e adult erat ed as m ent ioned above ln fact . um a 15: 12 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh leam ed counsel t he pet it ionercould not seriously JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document challenget he prosecut ioncase duringt he course of argunlentwhich st ands 58 0 Crlevn NO1441 of 2003 4 1 0 0 I C5 I Z 0 I 08 m 3 Z provedon recorcl As such convict ion of Shiv Charan under Sect ion 16a9O9 read wit h Sect ion 70f t he Act as recordedbybot h t he Court sbelow is m aint ained However in view t he fact s and circum st ancesof t he case t he fact t hat Swordof Dam ocles has rem ainedhanging t he head of Shiv Charan for t he last m ore t han case relat est o271 11 991 and t he lncarcerat ion for 718 daysafler his appealwas dism issedby t he lower Court I anl of t he consideredopiniont hat ends ofj ust icewill be if t he sent ence awardedt o t he is reduced t o t he m et already by him and sent ence of flne is enhancedt o Rs0001 I order accordinglyby t he sent ence order The will depositt he ainount of ft ne in t he t rial Court wit hin a periodof t wo m ont hsfrom t he dat e of receiptof a cert ified copy of t his order t o say if t he pet it ionerfails t o com plywit h t he direct ion of t he am ount of fine of Rs0001 in t he t rial Court Wit hin t he above t he sent ence of rigorous as awarded bybot h t he Court s below shall rem ainunalt ered Wit h t he above condlt ional m odiflcat ion in t he sent ence Ordert his pet it ionis dism issed March 08 2010 Jt 1 7 JUDGE 1 . um a 15: 12 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments