Joginder Kaur v. Chaitanya Kochar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act s. 13
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate, for the petitioner. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) The landlord has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to Rent Controller, Jalandhar to expedite the trial of eviction petition No. 80 of 2011 filed under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act. It is pleaded that the eviction petition has been filed and one of the ground for eviction is personal necessity. It has been further pleaded that this court in C.R. No. 302 of 2010 titled as, “Sandeep Ghai vs. Neeraj Malhotra” decided on
04.05.2010, issued direction to the Rent Controllers situated within the limits of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory to decide C.R NO. 5611 OF 2011 (O&M) -2- the eviction petitions filed on the ground of personal necessity or by specified landlord, within six months of the filing of same. It has been further submitted that the said prayer has been reiterated in C.R No. 4398 of 2011 titled as, “Umesh Uppal vs. M/s Jindal Auto Distributors and others” decided on
Operative part
22.07.2011. The contention raised by learned counsel for the revisionist carries weight. This Court in C.R No.302 of 2010 has passed the following order in respect to the decision of rent petitions filed on the ground of personal necessity or by specified landlord :-
Every petition based upon an averment of personal necessity or a petition filed by a specified landlord would be disposed of within six months of the filing thereof. For expeditious disposal, the Judicial Courts shall have to accord noticeable and compulsive priority to those cases.
Similar prayer was made in Umesh Uppal's case. The directions dated 04.05.2010 passed in C.R No.302 of 2010 were ordered to be sent to all the District and Sessions Judges in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory for compliance. The eviction petition, according to the petitioner, was filed in the year 2009 and the said directions were passed in the year 2010. So, in these circumstances, the Rent Controller, Jalandhar is directed to adhere to the directions given in C.R C.R NO. 5611 OF 2011 (O&M) -3- No.302 of 2010 referred to above. The next date before the Rent Controller is stated to be 22.09.2011. The Rent Controller shall decide the eviction petition within six months from that date. Any non-compliance of the order would be seriously viewed. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. The order be conveyed to the concerned Court, for strict compliance. SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 shalini (K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act — s. 13.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 15 Sep 2011. The bench was K C PURI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.