✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 31 Mar 2009

Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Gurmit Kaur & Ors.

Civil Revision No. 6120 of 2007A N JINDAL

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.S.M.Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.M.L.Saggar, Advocate. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. As per Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, an appeal has been provided against an order rejecting an application for setting aside the exparte decree. However, the petitioners, without availing the remedy provided under the statute, have directly sought interference by this court through the instant revision petition, which is unwarranted. Dismissed. March 31, 2009 `gian' ( A.N.JINDAL ) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 31 Mar 2009. The bench was A N JINDAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 6120 of 2007). ← Search more judgments