Tilak Raj v. Mandir Murti Radha Krishan & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Set aside
likely to delay the proceedings further, the impugned order is set aside
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ..... Present : Mr.Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J.(Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated
28.8.2008 by which his evidence has been closed by order. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that there is no infirmity in the impugned order. However, purely in the interest of justice and also for the reason that equitable justice can be ensured by payment of costs and considering the fact that this revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion as resorting to that process is likely to delay the proceedings further, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is granted one opportunity to lead his entire evidence for which the trial court shall fix one effective date. But considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2002 and about 6/7 C.R.No.5994 of 2008 -2- years have elapsed, the revision petition is accepted subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs.
22.12.2008 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: likely to delay the proceedings further, the impugned order is set aside
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 22 Dec 2008. The bench was MAHESH GROVER.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.