Inderjit Singh Sood v. A.N. Jindal, J
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 26 Jul 2012
Outcome
Allowed
In view of the matter, this petition is allowed, impugned orders
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. L.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the orders dated 8.6.2012 and
18.7.2012 passed by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner in all fairness has stated that besides the cross examination of DW-5 Jasbir Singh and DW-6 Inderjit Sood, by the plaintiff as allowed by the trial court vide order dated
Operative part
8.6.2012, he wants to tender only certain documents. In view of the matter, this petition is allowed, impugned orders are set aside and one opportunity is provided to the petitioner-defendant to tender his documents subject to payment of Rs.2000/- as costs. This petition is allowed without serving notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this court for recalling this order. July 26, 2012 deepak (A.N. Jindal) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the matter, this petition is allowed, impugned orders
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Jul 2012.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.