✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 10 Jul 2012

Smt. Raj Dulari & Ors. v. A.N. Jindal, J

Civil Revision No. 3551 of 2012A N JINDAL

Case at a glance

Decided
10 Jul 2012
Bench
A N JINDAL

Provisions considered

Judgment

Smt. Raj Dulari and others Raj Kumar and others Vs. .. Petitioners .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.1. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 9.5.2012 passed by the trial court. Since the property has been attached, therefore, the petitioners may file objections to the attachment, if any, or any other objection under Section 47 or under Order 21 Rule 58 of CPC, if so advised. Disposed of accordingly July 10, 2012 deepak (A.N. Jindal) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 21 r. 58.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 Jul 2012. The bench was A N JINDAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 3551 of 2012). ← Search more judgments