Sushil Kumar & Anr. v. Daya Wanti & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: None. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 11th December, 2006 passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana where Rent Controller had not fixed the provisional rent on the ground that the relationship of landlord and tenant has been denied. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, Rent Controller, Ludhiana is directed to decide the eviction petition instituted under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, within six months after the receipt of certified copy of this order. With these observations present revision petition is disposed off. November 06, 2008 [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 — s. 13.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 Nov 2008. The bench was KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.