09.09.2025 BALWINDER SINGH BALWINDER SINGH … v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS
Case Details
2020 CWP-926-2020 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 222 CWP-926-2020 Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 BALWINDER SINGH BALWINDER SINGH ….PETITIONER ….PETITIONER VERSUS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS
Legal Reasoning
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR ….RSPONDENTS S Present: Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. for the petitioner. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent-Corporation. for respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 Certiorari for quashing of the Constitution of India in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of the Constitution of India in the nature of of the Constitution of India in the nature of 3) issued by respondent the Gratuity Pay Order dated 02.01.2019 (P-3) issued by respondent the Gratuity Pay Order dated 02.01.2019 (P the Gratuity Pay Order dated 02.01.2019 (P om No.5, whereby the amount of Rs.2,38,356/- has been deducted from No.5, whereby the amount of Rs.2,38,356/ No.5, whereby the amount of Rs.2,38,356/ the gratuity of the petitioner, with the gratuity of the petitioner, with the gratuity of the petitioner, with the gratuity of the petitioner, with further direction to the further direction to the further direction to the further direction to the Corporation to restore the promotional increment given respondent-Corporation to restore the promotional increment given Corporation to restore the promotional increment given Corporation to restore the promotional increment given to the petitioner at the time of promotion as ALM on 31.03.1994 by to the petitioner at the time of promotion as ALM on 31.03.1994 by to the petitioner at the time of promotion as ALM on 31.03.1994 by to the petitioner at the time of promotion as ALM on 31.03.1994 by refixing his salary from 01.04.1995. refixing his salary from 01.04.1995. 2. or the petitioner submits that he Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he or the petitioner submits that he Learned counsel f confines his prayer in the present writ petition only to the extent of confines his prayer in the present writ petition only to the extent of confines his prayer in the present writ petition only to the extent of confines his prayer in the present writ petition only to the extent of Corporation from the gratuity of recovery made by the respondent-Corporation from the gratuity of recovery made by the respondent NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.10 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2020 CWP-926-2020 -2- the petitioner after 02 years from his retirement. The petitioner the petitioner after 02 years from his retirement. The petitioner the petitioner after 02 years from his retirement. The petitioner the petitioner after 02 years from his retirement. The petitioner retired on 31.12.2017 as Lineman from the respondent-Corporation retired on 31.12.2017 as Lineman from the respondent retired on 31.12.2017 as Lineman from the respondent and the recovery was ordered in the year 2019. The case of the and the recovery was ordered in the year 2019. The case of the and the recovery was ordered in the year 2019. The case of the and the recovery was ordered in the year 2019. The case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. State of Punjab and others Vs.