✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Tarlochan Singh Bassan v. Sumitra Devi

C.R No. 1479 of 2012G S SANDHAWALIA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, keeping in view this fact that the relief prayed for by the petitioner has been granted, no further orders are called for. The present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. It is, however, made clear that the petitioner shall…

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)

1.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for giving directions to the Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur to decide the petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short 'The Act'), which was filed on

09.05.2009.

2.

Vide order dated 07.03.2012, a report was called for from the concerned Rent Controller. Mr. Karamjit Singh Sullar, Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, who vide letter dated 11.04.2012, has submitted his report that the application under Section 13-B of the Act for leave to contest was disposed of on 23.03.2012. Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate, counsel for the petitioner verifies this fact, however, clarifies that the order is yet to be pronounced and 24.04.2012 is the date which is kept for pronouncement and arguments have already been heard. C.R. No. 1479 of 2012 2

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, keeping in view this fact that the relief prayed for by the petitioner has been granted, no further orders are called for. The present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. It is, however, made clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application in case there is further delay in pronouncement of orders.

17.04.2012 shivani (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. C.R No. 1479 of 2012). ← Search more judgments