✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 27 Aug 2024

(O&M) v. Bharti Chauhan

Fao No. 171 of 2024SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, PRINCIPAL56 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
27 Aug 2024
Bench
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, PRINCIPAL

Outcome

Allowed

In view of the same, the present appeal is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1818. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SURESHWAR THAKUR SURESHWAR THAKUR) ( (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 27, 2024…

Judgment

1.

The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula whereby the divorce petition filed by the appellant- husband under Section 13 whereby the divorce petition filed by the appellant whereby the divorce petition filed by the appellant under Section 13 b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage with the (i-a) and (i-b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage with the b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage with the b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage with the respondent-wife on the ground of cruelty and desertion was dismissed. wife on the ground of cruelty and desertion was dismissed. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2.

petition are The brief facts of the case as mentioned in the divorce petition are The brief facts of the case as mentioned in the divorce The brief facts of the case as mentioned in the divorce that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 04.09.2014 as per the that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 04.09.2014 as per the that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 04.09.2014 as per the that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 04.09.2014 as per the Hindu rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, one girl child namely Priyal Hindu rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, one girl child namely Priyal Hindu rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, one girl child namely Priyal Hindu rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, one girl child namely Priyal was born on 16.10.2015. The appellant is a doctor in Indian Army. Since there was born on 16.10.2015. The appellant is a doctor in Indian Army. Since there was born on 16.10.2015. The appellant is a doctor in Indian Army. Since there was born on 16.10.2015. The appellant is a doctor in Indian Army. Since there wife left the matrimonial home quarrels between the parties, the respondent-wife left the matrimonial home quarrels between the parties, the respondent were quarrels between the parties, the respondent TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -2- on 04.09.2016. The appellant-husband filed petition under Section 9 of on 04.09.2016. The appellant Hindu husband filed petition under Section 9 of Hindu on 12.09.2016. Thereafter, he withdrew the same on Marriage Act, 1955 on 12.09.2016. Thereafter, he withdrew the same on on 12.09.2016. Thereafter, he withdrew the same on Marriage Act, 1955

19.11.2018 and then filed petition under Section 13 of 19.11.2018 and then filed petitio the Hindu Marriage Act, n under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty and 1955 for decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

3.

Learned trial Court after taking into consideration the evidence on Learned trial Court after taking into consideration the evidence on Learned trial Court after taking into consideration the evidence on Learned trial Court after taking into consideration the evidence on record dismissed the petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed record dismissed the petition under Section 13 of record dismissed the petition under Section 13 of by the appellant-husband on the ground that it is the respondent by the appellant wife who had husband on the ground that it is the respondent-wife who had been the victim of cruelty at the hands of the appellant-husband. been the victim of cruelty at the hands of the appellant been the victim of cruelty at the hands of the appellant

PARTIES SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES SUBMISSIONS OF THE

4.

husband submits that the learned Principal Judge, Family Appellant-husband submits that the learned Principal Judge, Family husband submits that the learned Principal Judge, Family Appellant Hindu Marriage ourt dismissed the petition filed by him under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage ourt dismissed the petition filed by him under Section 13 of Court dismissed the petition filed by him under Section 13 of without taking into consideration the material facts and established Act, 1955 without taking into consideration the material facts and established without taking into consideration the material facts and established without taking into consideration the material facts and established evidence, which was placed on record by him. evidence, which was placed on record by him.

5.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent Per contra submits that the , learned counsel for the respondent-wife submits that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has rightly appreciated the evidence on learned Principal Judge, Family Court has rightly appreciated the evidence on learned Principal Judge, Family Court has rightly appreciated the evidence on learned Principal Judge, Family Court has rightly appreciated the evidence on record and has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section record and has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section record and has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section record and has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

6.

rned counsel for the We have heard the appellant as well as learned counsel for the We have heard the appellant as well as lea We have heard the appellant as well as lea respondent and perused the whole record. respondent and perused the whole record.

7.

This is an admitted fact that the parties are residing separately since This is an admitted fact that the parties are residing separately since This is an admitted fact that the parties are residing separately since This is an admitted fact that the parties are residing separately since years. the year 2016. Meaning thereby that they are living separately for the last 8 years. the year 2016. Meaning thereby that they are living separately the year 2016. Meaning thereby that they are living separately ANALYSIS OF THE RECORD ANALYSIS OF THE RECORD

8.

A perusal of the record shows as under: A perusal of the record shows as under:- i) husband on The divorce petition filed by the appellant-husband on The divorce petition filed by the appellant

19.12.2018, was decided on 22.12.2023. During this period and till 19.12.2018, was decided on 22.12.2023. During this period and till 19.12.2018, was decided on 22.12.2023. During this period and till 19.12.2018, was decided on 22.12.2023. During this period and till TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -3- today no efforts have been made by any of the parties even despite today no efforts have been made by any of the parties even despite today no efforts have been made by any of the parties even despite today no efforts have been made by any of the parties even despite dismissal of the divorce petition; dismissal of the divorce ii) ii) There are allegations and allegations by both the allegations and counter allegations by both the parties; parties; iii) iii) The wife has made numerous complaints to the Army numerous complaints to the Army Authorities against her husband; Authorities A perusal of order dated 30.01.2018 of the Nodal Officer, iv) A perusal of order dated 30.01.2018 of the Nodal Officer, A perusal of order dated 30.01.2018 of the Nodal Officer, iv) on Centre shows that a settlement could not Mediation and Conciliation Centre shows that a settlement could not on Centre shows that a settlement could not Mediation and Conciliati wife was not be reached between the parties because the respondent-wife was not be reached between the parties because the be reached between the parties because the husband withdrew the petition under present.

After that the appellant-husband withdrew the petition under husband withdrew the petition under present. Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 9 of for restoration of conjugal Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restoration of conjugal de order dated 19.11.2018; rights vide order dated 19.11.2018; rights vi v) Thereafter, the appellant- husband filed a petition under -husband filed a petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13 of , 1955; vi) ) A suit was filed by the respondent wife against the husband A suit was filed by the respondent-wife against the husband for asking her share in the property of the parents of the husband. for asking her share in the property of the parents of the husband. for asking her share in the property of the parents of the husband. for asking her share in the property of the parents of the husband. The same was dismissed in default. The same was dismissed in default.

The same was dismissed in default. vii) husband filed a complaint under Section 499 of ii) The appellant-husband filed a complaint under Section 499 of husband filed a complaint under Section 499 of IPC 1860 against the respondent- IPC 1860 against the resp wife. Judgment dated 28.03.2023 -wife. Judgment dated 28.03.2023 held by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula whereby it was held by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula held by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula whereby it that from the perusal of the complaint as well as the testimony of the that from the perusal of the complaint as well as the testimony of the that from the perusal of the complaint as well as the testimony of the that from the perusal of the complaint as well as the testimony of the complainant given in preliminary evidence is concerned complainant a prima given in preliminary evidence is concerned, a prima der Section 500 IPC is made out.

Hence the facie case under Section 500 IPC is made out. Hence the der Section 500 IPC is made out. Hence the facie case un wife was summoned to face trial for commission of respondent-wife was summoned to face trial for commission of wife was summoned to face trial for commission of respondent TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document offence under Section 500 IPC. offence under Section 500 IPC. (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -4- viii) The continuous making of allegations and counter allegations The continuous making of allegations and counter-allegations the parties has against each other show that the relationship between the parties has against each other show that the relationship between against each other show that the relationship between . Both the parties did not make any broken down beyond any repair. Both the parties did not make any . Both the parties did not make any broken down beyond any repair each other rather even during the pendency effort to reconcile with each other rather even during the pendency each other rather even during the pendency effort to reconcile as well of the divorce petition both of them kept on filing the cases as well of the divorce petition both of them kept on filing the case of the divorce petition both of them kept on filing the case as complaints against each other. as complaints against each other.

9.

Section 23(2) of Hindu Marriage Act Section 23(2) of reads that before Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads that before proceeding to grant any relief under the Hindu Marriage Act proceeding to grant any relief under the it shall be the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, it shall be the duty of the Court in the first instance, in every case where it is possible so to do duty of the Court in the first instance, in every case where it is possible so to do duty of the Court in the first instance, in every case where it is possible so to do duty of the Court in the first instance, in every case where it is possible so to do consistently with the nature and circumstance consistently with the of the case, to make every and circumstances of the case, to make every endeavour to bring about the reconciliation between the parties. endeavour to bring about the reconciliation between the parties. endeavour to bring about the reconciliation between the parties.

10.

, this In compliance of Section 23(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, this In compliance of Section 23(2) of In compliance of Section 23(2) of r dated Court directed both the parties to appear before this Court vide order dated Court directed both the parties to appear before this Court vide orde Court directed both the parties to appear before this Court vide orde

19.07.2024. This Court made every endeavour to settle the dispute between the 19.07.2024. This Court made every endeavour to settle the dispute between the 19.07.2024. This Court made every endeavour to settle the dispute between the 19.07.2024. This Court made every endeavour to settle the dispute between the we find that rather it would parties but after observing the conduct of the parties, we find that rather it would parties but after observing the conduct of the parties parties but after observing the conduct of the parties be harmful for both the parties if decree of divorce is not granted. This Court be harmful for both the parties if decree of divorce is not granted. This Court be harmful for both the parties if decree of divorce is not granted. This Court be harmful for both the parties if decree of divorce is not granted. This Court rves that there is no possibility of their staying/living together under one observes that there is no possibility of their staying/living together under one rves that there is no possibility of their staying/living together under one rves that there is no possibility of their staying/living together under one roof. Therefore, justice demands that they should be legally separated roof. Therefore, justice demands that they should be legally separated roof. Therefore, justice demands that they should be legally separated to avoid further litigation between them involving dissolving their marital ties to avoid further litigation between them involving to avoid further litigation between them involving dissolving their marital ties each other in other matters. each other in other matt SETTLED LAW SETTLED LAW

11.

Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2006 Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2006 Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2006 AIR Supreme Court 1675, held as under:- AIR Supreme Court 1675, “24 The cruelty alleged may largely depend upon the type of life 24. The cruelty alleged may largely depend upon the type of life The cruelty alleged may largely depend upon the type of life the parties are accustomed to or their economic and social the parties are accustomed to or their economic and social the parties are accustomed to or their economic and social the parties are accustomed to or their economic and social TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -5- conditions and their culture and human values to which they attach conditions and their culture and human values to which they attach conditions and their culture and human values to which they attach conditions and their culture and human values to which they attach importance.

Each case has to be decided on its own merits. importance. Each case has to be decided on its own merits. importance. Each case has to be decided on its own merits. * * * * * This Court in the case of Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra 28. This Court in the case of Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra This Court in the case of Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra 28. tated that Pandey, 2002(1) RCR (Civil) 719 : (2002)2 SCC 73, stated that Pandey, 2002(1) RCR (Civil) 719 : (2002)2 SCC 73, s Pandey, 2002(1) RCR (Civil) 719 : (2002)2 SCC 73, s mental cruelty is the conduct of other spouse which causes mental mental cruelty is the conduct of other spouse which causes mental mental cruelty is the conduct of other spouse which causes mental mental cruelty is the conduct of other spouse which causes mental suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other. "Cruelty", suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other.

"Cruelty", suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other. "Cruelty", suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other. "Cruelty", therefore, postulates a treatment of the petitioner with such cruelty therefore, postulates a treatment of the petitioner with such cruelty therefore, postulates a treatment of the petitioner with such cruelty therefore, postulates a treatment of the petitioner with such cruelty is or her mind that it as to cause a reasonable apprehension in his or her mind that it as to cause a reasonable apprehension in h as to cause a reasonable apprehension in h would be harmful or injurious for the petitioner to live with the other would be harmful or injurious for the petitioner to live with the other would be harmful or injurious for the petitioner to live with the other would be harmful or injurious for the petitioner to live with the other party. Cruelty, however, has to be distinguished from the ordinary party.

Cruelty, however, has to be distinguished from the ordinary party. Cruelty, however, has to be distinguished from the ordinary party. Cruelty, however, has to be distinguished from the ordinary wear and tear of family life. It cannot be decided on the basis of the wear and tear of family life. It cannot be decided on the basis of the wear and tear of family life. It cannot be decided on the basis of the wear and tear of family life. It cannot be decided on the basis of the tioner and has to be adjudged on the basis of sensitivity of the petitioner and has to be adjudged on the basis of tioner and has to be adjudged on the basis of sensitivity of the peti the course of conduct which would, in general, be dangerous for a the course of conduct which would, in general, be dangerous for a the course of conduct which would, in general, be dangerous for a the course of conduct which would, in general, be dangerous for a spouse to live with the other spouse to live with the other * * * * * . In Chetan Dass v.

Kamla Devi, 2001(2) RCR (Civil) 641 : 31. In Chetan Dass v. Kamla Devi, 2001(2) RCR (Civil) 641 : . In Chetan Dass v. Kamla Devi, 2001(2) RCR (Civil) 641 : 31 hat the matrimonial matters (2001)4 SCC 250, this Court observed that the matrimonial matters (2001)4 SCC 250, this Court observed t (2001)4 SCC 250, this Court observed t have to be basically decided on its facts. In the words of the Court : have to be basically decided on its facts. In the words of the Court : have to be basically decided on its facts. In the words of the Court : have to be basically decided on its facts. In the words of the Court : "Matrimonial matters are matters of delicate human and emotional "Matrimonial matters are matters of delicate human and emotional "Matrimonial matters are matters of delicate human and emotional "Matrimonial matters are matters of delicate human and emotional relationship. It demands mutual trust, regard, respect, love and relationship.

It demands mutual trust, regard, respect, love and relationship. It demands mutual trust, regard, respect, love and relationship. It demands mutual trust, regard, respect, love and lay for reasonable adjustments with the affection with sufficient play for reasonable adjustments with the lay for reasonable adjustments with the affection with sufficient p spouse. The relationship has to conform to the social norms as well. spouse. The relationship has to conform to the social norms as well. spouse. The relationship has to conform to the social norms as well. spouse. The relationship has to conform to the social norms as well. The matrimonial conduct has now come to be governed by statute The matrimonial conduct has now come to be governed by statute The matrimonial conduct has now come to be governed by statute The matrimonial conduct has now come to be governed by statute framed, keeping in view such norms and changed social order.

It is framed, keeping in view such norms and changed social order. It is framed, keeping in view such norms and changed social order. It is framed, keeping in view such norms and changed social order. It is rolled in the interest of the individuals as well as in sought to be controlled in the interest of the individuals as well as in rolled in the interest of the individuals as well as in sought to be cont broader perspective, for regulating matrimonial norms for making of broader perspective, for regulating matrimonial norms for making of broader perspective, for regulating matrimonial norms for making of broader perspective, for regulating matrimonial norms for making of knit, healthy and not a disturbed and porous society. The a well-knit, healthy and not a disturbed and porous society. The knit, healthy and not a disturbed and porous society. The a well institution of marriage occupies an important place and role to play institution of marriage occupies an important place and role to pla institution of marriage occupies an important place and role to pla institution of marriage occupies an important place and role to pla in the society, in general.

Therefore, it would not be appropriate to in the society, in general. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to in the society, in general. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to in the society, in general. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to apply any submission of "irretrievably broken marriage" as a apply any submission of "irretrievably broken marriage" as a apply any submission of "irretrievably broken marriage" as a apply any submission of "irretrievably broken marriage" as a straitjacket formula for grant of relief of divorce. This aspect has to straitjacket formula for grant of relief of divorce. This aspect has to straitjacket formula for grant of relief of divorce. This aspect has to straitjacket formula for grant of relief of divorce. This aspect has to TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -6- be considered be considered be considered the background of the background of the background of the other the other the other facts and circumstances of the case.

" circumstances of the case. " . In Sandhya Rani v. Kalyanram Narayanan, (1994) Supp. 2 SCC 32. In Sandhya Rani v. Kalyanram Narayanan, (1994) Supp. 2 SCC . In Sandhya Rani v. Kalyanram Narayanan, (1994) Supp. 2 SCC 32 588, this Court reiterated and took the view that since the parties are 588, this Court reiterated and took the view that since the parties are 588, this Court reiterated and took the view that since the parties are 588, this Court reiterated and took the view that since the parties are living separately for the last more than three years, we have no living separately for the last more than three years, we have no living separately for the last more than three years, we have no living separately for the last more than three years, we have no he marriage between the parties has doubt in our mind that the marriage between the parties has he marriage between the parties has doubt in our mind that t irretrievably broken down.

There is no chance whatsoever of their irretrievably broken down. There is no chance whatsoever of their irretrievably broken down. There is no chance whatsoever of their irretrievably broken down. There is no chance whatsoever of their coming together. Therefore, the Court granted the decree of divorce. coming together. Therefore, the Court granted the decree of divorce. coming together. Therefore, the Court granted the decree of divorce. coming together. Therefore, the Court granted the decree of divorce. . In the case of Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon, (1993)2 SCC 33. In the case of Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon, (1993)2 SCC . In the case of Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon, (1993)2 SCC 33 een living separately for so many years. This 6, the parties had been living separately for so many years. This een living separately for so many years. This 6, the parties had b Court came to the conclusion that there is no scope of settlement Court came to the conclusion that there is no scope of settlement Court came to the conclusion that there is no scope of settlement Court came to the conclusion that there is no scope of settlement between them because, according to the observation of this Court, between them because, according to the observation of this Court, between them because, according to the observation of this Court, between them because, according to the observation of this Court, the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no chance the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no chance the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no chance the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no chance ing together.

This Court granted decree of divorce. of their coming together. This Court granted decree of divorce. of their com * * * * * . The Court dealing with the petition for divorce on the ground of 41. The Court dealing with the petition for divorce on the ground of . The Court dealing with the petition for divorce on the ground of 41 cruelty has to bear in mind that the problems before it are those of cruelty has to bear in mind that the problems before it are those of cruelty has to bear in mind that the problems before it are those of cruelty has to bear in mind that the problems before it are those of ouse's conduct human beings and the psychological changes in a spouse's conduct human beings and the psychological changes in a sp human beings and the psychological changes in a sp have to be borne in mind before disposing of the petition for divorce. have to be borne in mind before disposing of the petition for divorce. have to be borne in mind before disposing of the petition for divorce. have to be borne in mind before disposing of the petition for divorce.

However, insignificant or trifling, such conduct may cause pain in However, insignificant or trifling, such conduct may cause pain in However, insignificant or trifling, such conduct may cause pain in However, insignificant or trifling, such conduct may cause pain in the mind of another. But before the conduct can be called cruelty, it the mind of another. But before the conduct can be called cruelty, it the mind of another. But before the conduct can be called cruelty, it the mind of another. But before the conduct can be called cruelty, it erity. It is for the Court to weigh the must touch a certain pitch of severity. It is for the Court to weigh the erity. It is for the Court to weigh the must touch a certain pitch of sev gravity. It has to be seen whether the conduct was such that no gravity. It has to be seen whether the conduct was such that no gravity. It has to be seen whether the conduct was such that no gravity.

It has to be seen whether the conduct was such that no reasonable person would tolerate it. It has to be considered whether reasonable person would tolerate it. It has to be considered whether reasonable person would tolerate it. It has to be considered whether reasonable person would tolerate it. It has to be considered whether the complainant should be called upon to endure as a part of normal the complainant should be called upon to endure as a part of normal the complainant should be called upon to endure as a part of normal the complainant should be called upon to endure as a part of normal ry matrimonial conduct, which may cause annoyance human life. Every matrimonial conduct, which may cause annoyance ry matrimonial conduct, which may cause annoyance human life. Eve to the other, may not amount to cruelty. Mere trivial irritations, to the other, may not amount to cruelty. Mere trivial irritations, to the other, may not amount to cruelty.

Mere trivial irritations, to the other, may not amount to cruelty. Mere trivial irritations, day married life, quarrels between spouses, which happen in day-to-day married life, quarrels between spouses, which happen in day quarrels between spouses, which happen in day may also not amount to cruelty. Cruelty in matrimonial life may be may also not amount to cruelty. Cruelty in matrimonial life may be may also not amount to cruelty. Cruelty in matrimonial life may be may also not amount to cruelty. Cruelty in matrimonial life may be founded variety, which can be subtle or brutal. It may be words, of unfounded variety, which can be subtle or brutal. It may be words, founded variety, which can be subtle or brutal. It may be words, of un gestures or by mere silence, violent or non-violent. gestures or by mere silence, violent or non gestures or by mere silence, violent or non . The foundation of a sound marriage is tolerance, adjustment and 42.

The foundation of a sound marriage is tolerance, adjustment and . The foundation of a sound marriage is tolerance, adjustment and 42 respecting one another. Tolerance to each other's fault to a certain respecting one another. Tolerance to each other's fault to a certain respecting one another. Tolerance to each other's fault to a certain respecting one another. Tolerance to each other's fault to a certain TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -7- bearable extent has to be inherent in every marriage. Petty quibbles, bearable extent has to be inherent in every marriage. Petty quibbles, bearable extent has to be inherent in every marriage. Petty quibbles, bearable extent has to be inherent in every marriage. Petty quibbles, trifling differences should not be exaggerated and magnified to trifling differences should not be exaggerated and magnified to trifling differences should not be exaggerated and magnified to trifling differences should not be exaggerated and magnified to destroy what is said to have been made in heaven.

All quarrels must destroy what is said to have been made in heaven. All quarrels must destroy what is said to have been made in heaven. All quarrels must destroy what is said to have been made in heaven. All quarrels must constitutes be weighed from that point of view in determining what constitutes be weighed from that point of view in determining what be weighed from that point of view in determining what cruelty in each particular case and as noted above, always keeping cruelty in each particular case and as noted above, always keeping cruelty in each particular case and as noted above, always keeping cruelty in each particular case and as noted above, always keeping in view the physical and mental conditions of the parties, their in view the physical and mental conditions of the parties, their in view the physical and mental conditions of the parties, their in view the physical and mental conditions of the parties, their sensitive character and social status.

A too technical and hyper-sensitive character and social status. A too technical and hyper character and social status. A too technical and hyper approach would be counter-productive to the in approach would be counter stitution of marriage. productive to the institution of marriage. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. The ideal It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. The ideal It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. The ideal It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. The ideal couple or a mere ideal one will probably have no occasion to go to couple or a mere ideal one will probably have no occasion to go to couple or a mere ideal one will probably have no occasion to go to couple or a mere ideal one will probably have no occasion to go to Matrimonial Court.

Matrimonial Court. P. Tripathy v. Arundhati Tripathy, 2005(3) RCR 43. In Durga P. Tripathy v. Arundhati Tripathy, 2005(3) RCR P. Tripathy v. Arundhati Tripathy, 2005(3) RCR 43 (Civil) 819 : (2005)7 SCC 353, this Court further observed that (Civil) 819 : (2005)7 SCC 353, this Court further observed that (Civil) 819 : (2005)7 SCC 353, this Court further observed that (Civil) 819 : (2005)7 SCC 353, this Court further observed that Marriages are made in heaven. Both parties have crossed the point Marriages are made in heaven. Both parties have crossed the point Marriages are made in heaven. Both parties have crossed the point Marriages are made in heaven. Both parties have crossed the point of no return. A workable solution is certainly not possible. Parties of no return. A workable solution is certainly not possible. Parties of no return. A workable solution is certainly not possible. Parties of no return.

A workable solution is certainly not possible. Parties this stage reconcile themselves and live together forgetting cannot at this stage reconcile themselves and live together forgetting this stage reconcile themselves and live together forgetting cannot at their past as a bad dream. We, therefore, have no other option their past as a bad dream. We, therefore, have no other option their past as a bad dream. We, therefore, have no other option their past as a bad dream. We, therefore, have no other option except to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the High except to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the High except to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the High except to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the High Court and affirming the order of the Family Court granting decree Court and affirming the order of the Family Court granting decree Court and affirming the order of the Family Court granting decree Court and affirming the order of the Family Court granting decree for divorce. for divorce. * * * * * . On May 22, 1969, the General Assembly of the Church of 50.

On May 22, 1969, the General Assembly of the Church of . On May 22, 1969, the General Assembly of the Church of 50 Scotland accepted the Report of their Moral and Social Welfare Scotland accepted the Report of their Moral and Social Welfare Scotland accepted the Report of their Moral and Social Welfare Scotland accepted the Report of their Moral and Social Welfare Board, which suggested the substitution of breakdown in place of Board, which suggested the substitution of breakdown in place of Board, which suggested the substitution of breakdown in place of Board, which suggested the substitution of breakdown in place of terest to quote what they said matrimonial offences. It would be of interest to quote what they said matrimonial offences. It would be of in matrimonial offences. It would be of in in their basis proposals :"Matrimonial offences are often the in their basis proposals :"Matrimonial offences are often the in their basis proposals :"Matrimonial offences are often the in their basis proposals :"Matrimonial offences are often the outcome rather than the cause of the deteriorating marriage.

An outcome rather than the cause of the deteriorating marriage. An outcome rather than the cause of the deteriorating marriage. An outcome rather than the cause of the deteriorating marriage. An accusatorial principle of divorce tends to encourage matrimonial accusatorial principle of divorce tends to encourage matrimonial accusatorial principle of divorce tends to encourage matrimonial accusatorial principle of divorce tends to encourage matrimonial widen the rift that is already there. offences, increase bitterness and widen the rift that is already there. widen the rift that is already there. offences, increase bitterness and Separation for a continuous period of at least two years consequent Separation for a continuous period of at least two years consequent Separation for a continuous period of at least two years consequent Separation for a continuous period of at least two years consequent upon a decision of at least one of the parties not to live with the upon a decision of at least one of the parties not to live with the upon a decision of at least one of the parties not to live with the upon a decision of at least one of the parties not to live with the other should act as the sole evidence of marriage breakdown.

" Once other should act as the sole evidence of marriage breakdown. " Once other should act as the sole evidence of marriage breakdown. " Once other should act as the sole evidence of marriage breakdown. " Once TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -8- e separated and the separation has continued for a the parties have separated and the separation has continued for a e separated and the separation has continued for a the parties hav sufficient length of time and one of them has presented a petition for sufficient length of time and one of them has presented a petition for sufficient length of time and one of them has presented a petition for sufficient length of time and one of them has presented a petition for divorce, it can well be presumed that the marriage has broken down. divorce, it can well be presumed that the marriage has broken down. divorce, it can well be presumed that the marriage has broken down. divorce, it can well be presumed that the marriage has broken down.

The court, no doubt, should seriously make an endeavour to The court, no doubt, should seriously make an endeavour to The court, no doubt, should seriously make an endeavour to The court, no doubt, should seriously make an endeavour to le the parties; yet, if it is found that the breakdown is reconcile the parties; yet, if it is found that the breakdown is le the parties; yet, if it is found that the breakdown is reconci irreparable, then divorce should not be withheld. The consequences irreparable, then divorce should not be withheld. The consequences irreparable, then divorce should not be withheld. The consequences irreparable, then divorce should not be withheld. The consequences of preservation in law of the unworkable marriage which has long of preservation in law of the unworkable marriage which has long of preservation in law of the unworkable marriage which has long of preservation in law of the unworkable marriage which has long ceased to be effective are bound to be a source of greater misery for ceased to be effective are bound to be a source of greater misery ceased to be effective are bound to be a source of greater misery for ceased to be effective are bound to be a source of greater misery the parties. the parties.

We have been principally impressed by the consideration that 52. We have been principally impressed by the consideration that We have been principally impressed by the consideration that 52. once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be unrealistic for the law not to take notice of that fact, and it would be unrealistic for the law not to take notice of that fact, and it would be unrealistic for the law not to take notice of that fact, and it would be unrealistic for the law not to take notice of that fact, and it would be interests of the parties. Where harmful to society and injurious to the interests of the parties. Where harmful to society and injurious to the harmful to society and injurious to the period of continuous separation, it may fairly there has been a long period of continuous separation, it may fairly period of continuous separation, it may fairly there has been a long be surmised that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair.

The be surmised that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair. The be surmised that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair. The be surmised that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair. The marriage becomes a fiction, though supported by a legal tie. By marriage becomes a fiction, though supported by a legal tie. By marriage becomes a fiction, though supported by a legal tie. By marriage becomes a fiction, though supported by a legal tie. By law in such cases do not serve the refusing to sever that tie the law in such cases do not serve the law in such cases do not serve the refusing to sever that tie the sanctity of marriage; on the contrary, it shows scant regard for the sanctity of marriage; on the contrary, it shows scant regard for the sanctity of marriage; on the contrary, it shows scant regard for the sanctity of marriage; on the contrary, it shows scant regard for the feelings and emotions of the parties. feelings and emotions of the parties. feelings and emotions of the parties.

Public interest demands not only that the married status should, 53. Public interest demands not only that the married status should, Public interest demands not only that the married status should, 53. d whenever possible, be as far as possible, as long as possible, and whenever possible, be as far as possible, as long as possible, an as far as possible, as long as possible, an maintained, but where a marriage has been wrecked beyond the maintained, but where a marriage has been wrecked beyond the maintained, but where a marriage has been wrecked beyond the maintained, but where a marriage has been wrecked beyond the hope of salvage, public interest lies in the recognition of that fact. hope of salvage, public interest lies in the recognition of that fact. hope of salvage, public interest lies in the recognition of that fact. Since there is no acceptable way in which a spouse can be 54. Since there is no acceptable way in which a spouse can be Since there is no acceptable way in which a spouse can be 54. sort, nothing is gained by compelled to resume life with the consort, nothing is gained by compelled to resume life with the con compelled to resume life with the con trying to keep the parties tied for ever to a marriage that in fact has trying to keep the parties tied for ever to a marriage that in fact has trying to keep the parties tied for ever to a marriage that in fact has trying to keep the parties tied for ever to a marriage that in fact has ceased to exist.” ceased to exist.” Constitution Bench of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Shilpa Sailesh 12.

Constitution Bench of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Constitution Bench of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in v.Varun Sreenivasan, 2024(1), observed as under: v.Varun Sreenivasan, 2024(1), observed as under:- “33 so, we wish to clearly state that grant of divorce 33. Having said so, we wish to clearly state that grant of divorce so, we wish to clearly state that grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -9- is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that `complete justice' is done to both parties.

It is obvious that this that `complete justice' is done to both parties. It is obvious that this that `complete justice' is done to both parties. It is obvious that this that `complete justice' is done to both parties. It is obvious that this Court should be fully convinced and satisfied that the marriage is Court should be fully convinced and satisfied that the marriage is Court should be fully convinced and satisfied that the marriage is Court should be fully convinced and satisfied that the marriage is totally unworkable, emotionally dead and beyond salvation and, totally unworkable, emotionally dead and beyond salvation and, totally unworkable, emotionally dead and beyond salvation and, totally unworkable, emotionally dead and beyond salvation and, tion and the only therefore, dissolution of marriage is the right solution and the only therefore, dissolution of marriage is the right solu therefore, dissolution of marriage is the right solu way forward.

That the marriage has irretrievably broken down is to way forward. That the marriage has irretrievably broken down is to way forward. That the marriage has irretrievably broken down is to way forward. That the marriage has irretrievably broken down is to be factually determined and firmly established. For this, several be factually determined and firmly established. For this, several be factually determined and firmly established. For this, several be factually determined and firmly established. For this, several factors are to be considered such as the period of time the parties factors are to be considered such as the period of time the parties factors are to be considered such as the period of time the parties factors are to be considered such as the period of time the parties e parties had last cohabited; had cohabited after marriage; when the parties had last cohabited; had cohabited after marriage; when th had cohabited after marriage; when th the nature of allegations made by the parties against each other and the nature of allegations made by the parties against each other and the nature of allegations made by the parties against each other and the nature of allegations made by the parties against each other and their family members; the orders passed in the legal proceedings their family members; the orders passed in the legal proceedings their family members; the orders passed in the legal proceedings their family members; the orders passed in the legal proceedings from time to time, cumulative impact on the personal relationship; from time to time, cumulative impact on the personal relationship; from time to time, cumulative impact on the personal relationship; from time to time, cumulative impact on the personal relationship; empts were made to settle the disputes by whether, and how many attempts were made to settle the disputes by empts were made to settle the disputes by whether, and how many att intervention of the court or through mediation, and when the last intervention of the court or through mediation, and when the last intervention of the court or through mediation, and when the last intervention of the court or through mediation, and when the last attempt was made, etc.

The period of separation should be attempt was made, etc. The period of separation should be attempt was made, etc. The period of separation should be attempt was made, etc. The period of separation should be sufficiently long, and anything above six years or more will be a sufficiently long, and anything above six years or more will be a sufficiently long, and anything above six years or more will be a sufficiently long, and anything above six years or more will be a se facts have to be evaluated keeping in view relevant factor. But these facts have to be evaluated keeping in view se facts have to be evaluated keeping in view relevant factor. But the and social status of the parties, including their the economic and social status of the parties, including their and social status of the parties, including their the economic educational qualifications, whether the parties have any children, educational qualifications, whether the parties have any children, educational qualifications, whether the parties have any children, educational qualifications, whether the parties have any children, their age, educational qualification, and whether the other spouse their age, educational qualification, and whether the other spouse their age, educational qualification, and whether the other spouse their age, educational qualification, and whether the other spouse are dependent, in which event how and in what manner and children are dependent, in which event how and in what manner are dependent, in which event how and in what manner and children the party seeking divorce intends to take care and provide for the the party seeking divorce intends to take care and provide for the the party seeking divorce intends to take care and provide for the the party seeking divorce intends to take care and provide for the spouse or the children.

Question of custody and welfare of minor spouse or the children. Question of custody and welfare of minor spouse or the children. Question of custody and welfare of minor spouse or the children. Question of custody and welfare of minor children, provision for fair and adequate alimony for the wife, and children, provision for fair and adequate alimony for the wife, and children, provision for fair and adequate alimony for the wife, and children, provision for fair and adequate alimony for the wife, and nomic rights of the children and other pending matters, if any, economic rights of the children and other pending matters, if any, nomic rights of the children and other pending matters, if any, are relevant considerations. We would not like to codify the factors are relevant considerations. We would not like to codify the factors are relevant considerations. We would not like to codify the factors are relevant considerations.

We would not like to codify the factors so as to curtail exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142(1) of the so as to curtail exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142(1) of the so as to curtail exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142(1) of the so as to curtail exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142(1) of the ome of the factors Constitution of India, which is situation specific. Some of the factors Constitution of India, which is situation specific. S Constitution of India, which is situation specific. S mentioned can be taken as illustrative, and worthy of consideration.” mentioned can be taken as illustrative, and worthy of consideration. mentioned can be taken as illustrative, and worthy of consideration. mentioned can be taken as illustrative, and worthy of consideration.

13.

In Rakesh Raman v. Kavita Rakesh Raman v. Kavita 2023 AIR Supreme Court 2144 2023 AIR Supreme Court 2144, the Hon’ble Apex Court held as under:- Hon’ble Apex Court held as under: TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -10- “18 We have a married couple before us who have barely stayed 18. We have a married couple before us who have barely stayed We have a married couple before us who have barely stayed together as a couple for four years and who have now been living together as a couple for four years and who have now been living together as a couple for four years and who have now been living together as a couple for four years and who have now been living separately for the last 25 years. There is no child out of the wedlock. separately for the last 25 years. There is no child out of the wedlock. separately for the last 25 years.

There is no child out of the wedlock. separately for the last 25 years. There is no child out of the wedlock. The matrimonial bond is completely broken and is beyond repair. The matrimonial bond is completely broken and is beyond repair. The matrimonial bond is completely broken and is beyond repair. The matrimonial bond is completely broken and is beyond repair. continuation We have no doubt that this relationship must end as its continuation We have no doubt that this relationship must end as its We have no doubt that this relationship must end as its is causing cruelty on both the sides. The long separation and is causing cruelty on both the sides. The long separation and is causing cruelty on both the sides. The long separation and is causing cruelty on both the sides. The long separation and absence of cohabitation and the complete breakdown of all absence of cohabitation and the complete breakdown of all absence of cohabitation and the complete breakdown of all absence of cohabitation and the complete breakdown of all meaningful bonds and the existing bitterness between the two, has to meaningful bonds and the existing bitterness between the two, has to meaningful bonds and the existing bitterness between the two, has to meaningful bonds and the existing bitterness between the two, has to 5 Act.

We be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the 1955 Act. We be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the 195 be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the 195 therefore hold that in a given case, such as the one at hand, where therefore hold that in a given case, such as the one at hand, where therefore hold that in a given case, such as the one at hand, where therefore hold that in a given case, such as the one at hand, where the marital relationship has broken down irretrievably, where there the marital relationship has broken down irretrievably, where there the marital relationship has broken down irretrievably, where there the marital relationship has broken down irretrievably, where there is a long separation and absence of cohabitation (as in the present is a long separation and absence of cohabitation (as in the present is a long separation and absence of cohabitation (as in the present is a long separation and absence of cohabitation (as in the present ourt cases between the case for the last 25 years), with multiple Court cases between the case for the last 25 years), with multiple case for the last 25 years), with multiple of such a `marriage' would only mean parties; then continuation of such a `marriage' would only mean of such a `marriage' would only mean parties; giving sanction to cruelty which each is inflicting on the other.

We giving sanction to cruelty which each is inflicting on the other. We giving sanction to cruelty which each is inflicting on the other. We giving sanction to cruelty which each is inflicting on the other. We are also conscious of the fact that a dissolution of this marriage are also conscious of the fact that a dissolution of this marriage are also conscious of the fact that a dissolution of this marriage are also conscious of the fact that a dissolution of this marriage es as there is no child out of the would affect only the two parties as there is no child out of the es as there is no child out of the would affect only the two parti wedlock.” wedlock.”

14.

This Court in FAO No.M-287-2018, This Court in FAO No.M Sanjeev Kumar Vs. 2018, titled as Sanjeev Kumar Vs. Suman observed as under : observed as under :- “20 There is no dispute regarding the fact of institution of 20. There is no dispute regarding the fact of institution of There is no dispute regarding the fact of institution of husband as well as his family different cases against the appellant-husband as well as his family different cases against the appellant different cases against the appellant , 1955, members. Though under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 members. Though under Section 13 of members. Though under Section 13 of different grounds for dissolution of marriage are mentioned and the different grounds for dissolution of marriage are mentioned and the different grounds for dissolution of marriage are mentioned and the different grounds for dissolution of marriage are mentioned and the ecree of divorce can be granted, if any of the parties are able to decree of divorce can be granted, if any of the parties are able to ecree of divorce can be granted, if any of the parties are able to ecree of divorce can be granted, if any of the parties are able to prove the same against the other by leading cogent and convincing prove the same against the other by leading cogent and convincing prove the same against the other by leading cogent and convincing prove the same against the other by leading cogent and convincing evidence etc.

But the factual and practical aspect of such kind of evidence etc. But the factual and practical aspect of such kind of evidence etc. But the factual and practical aspect of such kind of evidence etc. But the factual and practical aspect of such kind of cases is that the Courts cannot force the parties to liv cases is that the Courts e together, force the parties to live together, , 1955 despite the dismissal of Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 despite the dismissal of Section 13 of despite the dismissal of Section 13 of TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -11- petition for decree of divorce filed by any of the parties and despite petition for decree of divorce filed by any of the parties and despite petition for decree of divorce filed by any of the parties and despite petition for decree of divorce filed by any of the parties and despite the fact of their not being able to prove the ground on which they the fact of their not being able to prove the ground on which they the fact of their not being able to prove the ground on which they the fact of their not being able to prove the ground on which they n litigation under the were asking for dissolution of marriage.

In litigation under the were asking for dissolution of marriage. I were asking for dissolution of marriage. I , practically speaking, there cannot be Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, practically speaking, there cannot be , practically speaking, there cannot be Hindu Marriage Act win situation is that the any win or loose situation. The only win-win situation is that the any win or loose situation. The only win any win or loose situation. The only win parties amicably settle down their status mutually. Even if the parties amicably settle down their status mutually. Even if the parties amicably settle down their status mutually. Even if the parties amicably settle down their status mutually. Even if the divorce petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act,, 1955 for divorce petition under Section 13 of divorce petition under Section 13 of grant of decree of divorce is dismissed or for that matter petition grant of decree of divorce is dismissed or for that matter petition grant of decree of divorce is dismissed or for that matter petition grant of decree of divorce is dismissed or for that matter petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, under Section 9 of for restitution of Hindu Marriage Act,, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights is allowed, practically speaking there cannot be any conjugal rights is allowed, practically speaking there cannot be any conjugal rights is allowed, practically speaking there cannot be any conjugal rights is allowed, practically speaking there cannot be any matters.

Since the parties to the litigation execution in such kind of matters. Since the parties to the litigation matters. Since the parties to the litigation execution in such kind of are not the properties for which execution can be filed to retrieve it are not the properties for which execution can be filed to retrieve it are not the properties for which execution can be filed to retrieve it are not the properties for which execution can be filed to retrieve it to the other party. Emotions are attached to the parties for which to the other party. Emotions are attached to the parties for which to the other party. Emotions are attached to the parties for which to the other party. Emotions are attached to the parties for which they cannot be forced to live together. Once the conduct and the they cannot be forced to live together. Once the conduct and the they cannot be forced to live together. Once the conduct and the they cannot be forced to live together.

Once the conduct and the o live together during the period of their separation and effort to live together during the period of their separation and o live together during the period of their separation and effort t gravity of allegations made against each other is observed, that gravity of allegations made against each other is observed, that gravity of allegations made against each other is observed, that gravity of allegations made against each other is observed, that would actually be the weights and measures to decide the would actually be the weights and measures to decide the would actually be the weights and measures to decide the would actually be the weights and measures to decide the matrimonial cases under the Hindu Marriage Act, matrimonial cases under the Hindu Marriage Act,, 1955. * * * * *

26.

26 In view of latest law laid down by Hon’ble the Supreme Court, In view of latest law laid down by Hon’ble the Supreme Court, In view of latest law laid down by Hon’ble the Supreme Court, every effort should be made by the Courts to save the marriage of every effort should be made by the Courts to save the marriage of every effort should be made by the Courts to save the marriage of every effort should be made by the Courts to save the marriage of the parties but where the Courts find that there is no possibility of the parties but where the Courts find that there is no possibility of the parties but where the Courts find that there is no possibility of the parties but where the Courts find that there is no possibility of rt and their reconciliation since the parties are emotionally hurt and their reconciliation since the parties are emotionally hu their reconciliation since the parties are emotionally hu broken down then by announcing the judgment and directing them to broken down then by announcing the judgment and directing them to broken down then by announcing the judgment and directing them to broken down then by announcing the judgment and directing them to live together by not granting the decree of dissolution of marriage live together by not granting the decree of dissolution of marriage live together by not granting the decree of dissolution of marriage live together by not granting the decree of dissolution of marriage TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -12- would amount to forcing them to live together under one roof. would amount to forcing them to live together under one roof. would amount to forcing them to live together under one roof. would amount to forcing them to live together under one roof. own of both of Further it would amount to inviting emotional break down of both of Further it would amount to inviting emotional break d Further it would amount to inviting emotional break d them. * * * * *

28.

28 In matrimonial cases seeking a decree of divorce on any In matrimonial cases seeking a decree of divorce on any In matrimonial cases seeking a decree of divorce on any other grounds, it is often difficult to practically prove the allegations other grounds, it is often difficult to practically prove the allegations other grounds, it is often difficult to practically prove the allegations other grounds, it is often difficult to practically prove the allegations Courts should not decide such cases made by the parties inter se. Courts should not decide such cases Courts should not decide such cases made by the parties of proof of allegations or the evidence presented, solely on the basis of proof of allegations or the evidence presented, of proof of allegations or the evidence presented, solely on the basis as is done in criminal cases. After all even if the allegations are as is done in criminal cases. After all even if the allegations are as is done in criminal cases. After all even if the allegations are as is done in criminal cases. After all even if the allegations are proved to be correct beyond reasonable doubt, these are not the proved to be correct beyond reasonable doubt, these are not the proved to be correct beyond reasonable doubt, these are not the proved to be correct beyond reasonable doubt, these are not the criminal cases where the offence is punishable. criminal cases where the offence is punishable. criminal cases where the offence is punishable.

29.

29 rs, the only possible outcomes are either In matrimonial matters, the only possible outcomes are either rs, the only possible outcomes are either the granting of a decree of divorce or the dismissal of the petition for the granting of a decree of divorce or the dismissal of the petition for the granting of a decree of divorce or the dismissal of the petition for the granting of a decree of divorce or the dismissal of the petition for such a decree. In either case, no execution or punishment can be such a decree. In either case, no execution or punishment can be such a decree. In either case, no execution or punishment can be such a decree. In either case, no execution or punishment can be imposed, as no court can compel the parties to live together under imposed, as no court can compel the parties to live together under imposed, as no court can compel the parties to live together under imposed, as no court can compel the parties to live together under one roof or to cohabit. one roof

15.

In the present case, the parties are living separately since 2016 and In the present case, the parties are living separately since 2016 and In the present case, the parties are living separately since 2016 and In the present case, the parties are living separately since 2016 and no efforts have been made by any of them to resume their relations or to cohabit no efforts have been made by any of them to resume their relations or to cohabit no efforts have been made by any of them to resume their relations or to cohabit no efforts have been made by any of them to resume their relations or to cohabit rather allegations and counter-allegations, complaints and counter rather allegations and counter complaints allegations, complaints and counter-complaints marriage between the en made against each other. This shows that the marriage between the en made against each other. This shows that have been made against each other.

This shows that parties has broken down irretrievably. Therefore, in view of law laid down by parties has broken down irretrievably. Therefore, in view of law laid down by parties has broken down irretrievably. Therefore, in view of law laid down by parties has broken down irretrievably. Therefore, in view of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in matrimonial matters under the Hindu Marriage Act, Hon’ble Supreme Court in matrimonial matters under the Hindu Marriage Act, Hon’ble Supreme Court in matrimonial matters under the Hindu Marriage Act, Hon’ble Supreme Court in matrimonial matters under the Hindu Marriage Act, possibility 1955 and by this Court referred to above, we do not find any kind of possibility 1955 and by this Court referred to above, we do not find any 1955 and by this Court referred to above, we do not find any of settlement between the parties and justice demand of settlement between be allowed and justice demands that the appeal be allowed and decree of divorce under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for and decree of divorce under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for and decree of divorce under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for and decree of divorce under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) FAO-171-2024 (O&M) -13- dissolution of marriage of the parties be granted. dissolution of marriage of the parties be granted. dissolution of marriage of the parties be granted.

Operative part

16.

lowed. The judgment In view of the same, the present appeal is allowed. The judgment In view of the same, the present appeal is al In view of the same, the present appeal is al and decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, and decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, and decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, and decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, husband succeeds. Panchkula, is set aside and the petition filed by the appellant-husband succeeds. Panchkula, is set aside and the petition filed by the Panchkula, is set aside and the petition filed by the The decree of divorce under section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 The decree of divorce under section 13 of The decree of divorce under section 13 of lution of marriage of parties is granted and marriage between the parties lution of marriage of parties is granted and marriage between the pa dissolution of marriage of parties is granted and marriage between the pa heet be prepared accordingly. stands dissolved. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly stands dissolved. Decree s PERMANENT ALIMONY PERMANENT ALIMONY

17.

After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this particular case, this Court tried its level best to do justice to both the parties by particular case, this Court tried its level best to do justice to both the parties by particular case, this Court tried its level best to do justice to both the parties by particular case, this Court tried its level best to do justice to both the parties by fixing the permanent alimony. The appellant is directed to deposit Rs.20 lakh in fixing the permanent alimony. The appellant is directed to deposit Rs.20 lakh in fixing the permanent alimony. The appellant is directed to deposit Rs.20 lakh in fixing the permanent alimony. The appellant is directed to deposit Rs.20 lakh in wife within a period of six months from today. He is the account of respondent-wife within a period of six months from today. He is wife within a period of six months from today. He is the account of respo further directed to deposit Rs.15,000/- per month towards maintenance further directed to deposit Rs.15,000/ of his per month towards maintenance of his daughter in her account. It is further directed that he shall bear all the expenses her account. It is further directed that he shall bear all the expenses account. It is further directed that he shall bear all the expenses towards the marriage and he shall not disinherit her from his marriage of her daughter and he shall not disinherit her from his and he shall not disinherit her from his estate at any point of time. estate at any point of

18.

All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SURESHWAR THAKUR SURESHWAR THAKUR) ( (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 27, 2024 , 2024 tripti TRIPTI SAINI 2024.08.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Speaking Yes / No

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the present appeal is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — ss. 9, 13, 23(2); Marriage Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 499, 500; Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Aug 2024. The bench was SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, PRINCIPAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Fao No. 171 of 2024). ← Search more judgments