✦ High Court of India · 06 Nov 2012

Avtar Singh v. Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & Ors.

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Nov 2012
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Nov 2012
Length
2,393 words

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3187 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Darshan Kumar & ors. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3186 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Sunny Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3185 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Karam Din & ors. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3184 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Narinder Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3183 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Sher Ali ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3190 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Raj Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3189 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Ashok Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3192 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Randeep Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3191 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Sulinder Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3225 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Vikas Sharma ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3224 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Sudesh Kumari & ors. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3223 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Balwant Raj ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3222 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 06.11.2012 Kamal Kishore ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. November 06, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments