✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 12 Oct 2012

Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2012

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3023 of 2012RAKESH KUMAR GARG

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioners. RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. (ORAL) Non-compliance of the order dated 16th August, 2012 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talwandi Sabo in Civil Suit No.249 dated 20th July, 2012 has been alleged in this contempt petition. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners states that this petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to seek an appropriate remedy under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC before the Court concerned. Ordered accordingly. October 12, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2, 2A.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Oct 2012. The bench was RAKESH KUMAR GARG.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3023 of 2012). ← Search more judgments