Parkash Singh v. Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & Anr.

Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2641 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Yugal Kishore ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2642 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Rakesh Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2657 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Hans Raj ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2658 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Umesh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2659 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Hussain Mohammad and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2660 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Darshan Kumar & ors. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2679 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Krishan Singh and anr. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2680 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Ganesh Dutt ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2681 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Pritam Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2682 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Yash Pal ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2683 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Shiv Dev Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2684 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Jagdish Raj & anr. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2685 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Ashok Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2686 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Lekh Raj ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2687 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Rakesh Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2688 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Yash Pal ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2689 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Shubh Kumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & ors. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2702 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Subash Chander ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2703 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2012 Banti Ram & anr. ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh.KBS Sidhu, IAS & anr. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Necessary requisites shall be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present contempt petition is covered by a judgment of this Court dated 31.7.2012 passed in COCP No.1435 of 2012. Thus, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in COCP No.1435 of 2012 and other connected cases, decided on 31.7.2012. September 18, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE