✦ High Court of India

M/s A.P. Govt. Contractor M/s A.P. Govt. Contractor v. Tejveer Singh, IAS and others Tejveer Singh, IAS and others

Case Details

COCP-17 7-2025 (O&M) [1] 177 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH COCP No. COCP No. 17-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.02.2025 Date of Decision: M/s A.P. Govt. Contractor M/s A.P. Govt. Contractor ...Petitioner VERSUS Tejveer Singh, IAS and others Tejveer Singh, IAS and others …Respondents …Respondents

Legal Reasoning

HARKESH MANUJA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE r. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Present : Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Present : Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA, Notice of motion. 2. Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate, who is present in Court, Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate, who is present in Court, Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and files Short reply by accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and files Short reply by accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and files Short reply by accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and files Short reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Gautam Jain, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal way of affidavit of Sh. Gautam Jain, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal way of affidavit of Sh. Gautam Jain, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal way of affidavit of Sh. Gautam Jain, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal 25. Corporation, Jalandhar along with speaking order dated 15.01.2025. Corporation, Jalandhar along with speaking order dated 15.01.20 Corporation, Jalandhar along with speaking order dated 15.01.20 The same is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate The same is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate The same is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate The same is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per the speaking order, details of bills amounting to Rs.65,33,115/- ha the speaking order, details of bills amounting to Rs. the speaking order, details of bills amounting to Rs. have f shall be released to been received and the payment in lieu thereof shall be released to been received and the payment in lieu thereo been received and the payment in lieu thereo the petitioner within a period of one and half month from today. He the petitioner within a period of one and half month from today. He the petitioner within a period of one and half month from today. He the petitioner within a period of one and half month from today. He further submits that with respect to the remaining bills, the petitioner further submits that with respect to the remaining bills, the petitioner further submits that with respect to the remaining bills, the petitioner further submits that with respect to the remaining bills, the petitioner may approach the respondents with necessary documents by moving may approach the respondents with necessary documents by moving may approach the respondents with necessary documents by moving may approach the respondents with necessary documents by moving a representation. a representation. 4. 5.

Decision

view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his grievance regarding unsatisfied claim, if any, by filing representation grievance regarding unsatisfied claim, if any, by filing representation grievance regarding unsatisfied claim, if any, by filing representation grievance regarding unsatisfied claim, if any, by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from SANJAY GUPTA 2025.02.07 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-17 7-2025 (O&M) [2] y, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four today, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four y, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four y, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a y on the part of period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any dela period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any dela the respondent(s), the officer(s) concerned would be liable to pay the respondent(s), the officer(s) concerned would be liable to pay the respondent(s), the officer(s) concerned would be liable to pay the respondent(s), the officer(s) concerned would be liable to pay to the petitioner from his/ her own pocket. costs of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner from his/ her own pocket. costs of Rs.50,000/ 6. y, shall also Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. stand disposed of 2025 06.02.2025 sanjay ( HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? Yes/No Yes/No SANJAY GUPTA 2025.02.07 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments