✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 05 Apr 2024

Raj Kumar Malhotra v. Satish Malhotra Etc

Cr No. 2008 of 1989ALKA SARIN

Judgment

Present : Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1.

The present is a fully burnt case and there is no record available pertaining to present petition. The Registry has not been able to reconstruct the file despite best efforts. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not have the copy of the paper-book nor he has been able to contact the petitioner. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.

2.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

05.04.2024 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Yogesh Sharma 2024.04.08 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cr No. 2008 of 1989). ← Search more judgments