APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION v. Competent Authority / Special Land Acquisition
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Provisions considered
Judgment
No notice is need to be issued to the respondents as Mr. Pranjal Mehrotra is appearing on behalf of contesting respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to serve a complete set of this appeal upon learned Standing Counsel, who represent respondent no.
1.
Summon the lower court records. List after receipt of lower court records. In the meantime, learned counsel for the respondents may file counter affidavit. April 6, 2026 Rahul Dwivedi/- (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 83 of 2026).
← Search more judgments