Honey v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage,
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage, with the aforesaid liberty. May 14, 2026 Sumit K. (Siddharth Nandan,J.)
Judgment
Heard Shri Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jitendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on behalf of State-respondents.
Shri Jitendra Singh, learned A.C.S.C has raised a preliminary objection that the remedy of the petitioner is by applying for scrutiny of the aforesaid paper under Chapter XII, Regulation 21(e) of Part II-B of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, at this stage, with liberty to apply for scrutiny as provided under the Act, 1921.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage, with the aforesaid liberty. May 14, 2026 Sumit K. (Siddharth Nandan,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
II-B of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.