✦ Allahabad High Court

M/S. Greater Noida Hostela And Infrastructures v. State of U.P & Anr.

AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 797 of 2026ARUN KUMAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted two weeks time to 2 WRIC No. 797 of 2026 seek instructions, regarding the decision taken on the revision filed by the petitioner bearing Case No. 59 Appeal/77-4-2025.

Judgment

Prakhar Saran Srivastava : : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

1.

Heard Sri Tarun Agarwal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Prakhar Saran Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Anjali Upadhya, Advocate for the respondent no. 2.

2.

It is contended by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to cancellation of allotment of Plot No.206, Sector -Knowledge Park-V, Greater Noida, the petitioner had preferred a revision, under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. As the revision was pending consideration, the petitioner filed Writ - C No. 33958 of 2025, which was disposed of vide order of this Court dated

25.09.2025, directing the respondent no. 1 to decide the application for interim relief within three weeks and the entire revision expeditiously within a period of two months.

3.

It is contended by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the said revision was finally heard on 15.10.2025, but till date no order has been passed. It is further contended that in the meantime, the respondent no. 2 has proceeded to allot the plot in question.

4.

Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted two weeks time to 2 WRIC No. 797 of 2026 seek instructions, regarding the decision taken on the revision filed by the petitioner bearing Case No. 59 Appeal/77-4-2025.

5.

List again as fresh on 11.03.2026. February 23, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu (Arun Kumar,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 797 of 2026). ← Search more judgments