Writ Petition No. 4506 of 2026 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- VIBHA KANKANWADI, AJIT B KADETHANKAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
2 WP 4506 OF 2026+IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD2 WRIT PETITION NO. 4506 OF 2026GODAVARI MANAR CHRITABLE TURST SHANKAR NAGAR BILOLIVERSUSTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY MINISTRY OF EDUCATIONDEPT. AND ORS.… Mr. S. S. Patil, Advocate for the PetitionerMr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.5AND4 WRIT PETITION NO. 4508 OF 2026SHRI JAYBHAVANI BAHUUDESHIYA SAMAJSEVI SANSTHAMANGALWARPETHVERSUSTHE UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETORY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION DEPTOF SCHOOL AND OTHERS...Mr. S. S. Patil, Advocate for the PetitionerMr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondent No.5…CORAM:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.DATE:23.04.2026PER COURT :-.These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25%students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Childrento Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. ( 2 ) 2 WP 4506 OF 2026+2.Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice forrespondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Advocates Mr. S. B.Pulkundwar and Mr. B. B. Bhise waive notice for respondents/Zilla Parishad inrespective petitions. 3. We have heard both the sides. 4. We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. )PRW
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.