✦ Bombay High Court · 03 Feb 2026

Board Sr.No.:-33 v. Mumbai Pune Expressway Limited

Interim Application No. 288 of 2026GAURI GODSE

Judgment

Mr Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate (Through VC) a/w Mr Sumeet Nankani and Mr Durgaprasad Poojari i/b PDS Legal for Applicant / Plaintiff. Ms Vinodini Srinivasan a/w Mr Arun Siwach (Through VC), Ms Priyanka Mitra and Ms Nupur Shah for Defendant. (Mentioned out of turn) CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 3rd February, 2026 Page 1/2 P.C. : By consent S.O. to 10/02/2026 If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( ASSOCIATE ) Page 2/2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 288 of 2026). ← Search more judgments