COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 728 OF 2025 Tata Capital Limited v. K K Birla and Co
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Resham Vasant Savla, i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for the Petitioner. Appearance not received for Respondent. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2026 ORDER :
#1. This is a Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, which expired on August 9, 2025.
#2. Today, when the matter is called out, Learned Counsel for the parties jointly submit that the matter proceeded ex parte before the Arbitral Tribunal. Therefore, bearing in mind the stage at which the arbitral proceedings are placed, they jointly request for an extension of mandate by a period of six months. Ashwini Vallakati January 30, 2026 ASHWINI JANARDAN VALLAKATI ASHWINI JANARDAN VALLAKATI
#3. In these circumstances, taking into account the stage at which the Arbitral proceedings are placed, this Petition is finally disposed of extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months rounded upto July 31, 2026.
#4. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website. [ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] Ashwini Vallakati January 30, 2026
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Jan 2026. The bench was SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.