Hitesh Bhuralal Jain v. Rajpal Amarnath Yadav & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Feb 2025
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the liberty as prayed for. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) 1
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 4 OF 2025 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE 18:02:20 +0530 Hitesh Bhuralal Jain Versus Rajpal Amarnath Yadav & Ors. } } Appellant Respondent Mr. Rishikesh Soni i/b. Ms. Anjali Mishra for appellant. Mr. A. S. Pal with Ms. Pooja P. Yadav for respondent no. 1. CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2025 PC:
This appeal under section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been filed against an order dated 13th January 2025 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, by which, the notice of motion filed by the appellant seeking stay of the proceedings under section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been rejected.
Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the appellant be granted liberty to withdraw the appeal with liberty to prosecute other remedy available in law.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the liberty as prayed for. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) 1
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Commercial Courts Act, 2015; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 10.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Feb 2025. The bench was ARIF S DOCTOR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.