Siddhant Timayya Thanekar v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
stands disposed of as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The learned counsel for the applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this application. Allowed to be withdrawn. Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.777 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2025 Siddhant Timayya Thanekar Versus State of Maharashtra ...Applicant ...Respondent __________ Mr. Jay Salunke h/f Mr. Shantanu Kolhe, for the Applicant. Ms. P.P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent – State. MHB Colony Police Station, Mumbai Pairavi Officer - PSI Khose present in Court. __________ CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 14 MAY 2025 (VACATION COURT) P.C.:
Operative part
The learned counsel for the applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this application. Allowed to be withdrawn. Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Interim Application would become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] Pallavi
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: stands disposed of as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 14 May 2025. The bench was ADVAIT M SETHNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.