Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 910 OF 2025 Rushikesh S/o. Bhausaheb ThombreVs.State of Maharashtra and another------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's OrderCoram, appearances, Court's Ordersor directions and Registrar’s order------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Shri S. J. Salunke, Advocate for applicant. Ms. Harshada Prabhu, APP for non-applicant no. 1/State. Ms. Radha Mishra, Advocate appointed for respondent no. 2.CORAM :- M. W. CHANDWANI, J.DATED :- 16.01.2026 It appears that while granting interim protection, no direction of attendance of the applicant in the concerned Police Station has been issued. Thelearned APP submits that interrogation of the applicant is required hence, the applicant is directed to attend the concerned Police Station on every Friday between 10:00am to 12 noon.
List this matter on 28.01.2026.
Needless the mention that the applicant shall be treated in the custody within the meaning of Section23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 for the period for which he is under the interim protection. Theapplicant shall co-operate in the investigation. (M. W. CHANDWANI, J.)RR Jaiswal
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.