Prahlad Dinkar Sonule v. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4685 OF 2025 Prahlad Dinkar Sonule Versus The State Of Maharashtra and Anr. SONALI SATISH KILAJE SATISH KILAJE 10:05:50 +0700 _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Sana Shiakh, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S.M.Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State. Ms. Disha Rathod, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Through VC). _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : DATE : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. 15th APRIL, 2026. P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she needs to go through the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C.
Learned APP to supply copy of statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., if recorded.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.