NILAM v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr.Rajendra Shirodkar i/b Mr.Archit Sakhalkar, for the Applicant. Mr.Sanjeev P. Kadam a/w Mr.Suraj Mahadgut i/b Mr.Prashant P. Raut, for the Intervenor/Original Complainant. Mr.Swapnil Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State. ________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 27th JANUARY, 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned senior counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and learned senior counsel for the Intervenor.
Leave to add name of the Intervenor as party Respondent. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. The learned Senior counsel for the Intervenor seeks time to go through the statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. N.S.Kamble
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Jan 2026. The bench was SHIVKUMAR DIGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.