Devendra @ Sonya Laxman Mhatre v. State Of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Intervention Application is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Stand over to 27th January 2026. Intervention Application is allowed. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Judgment
Mr.Rajendra Shirodkar i/b Mr.Archit Sakhalkar, for the Applicant in BA No.4610 of 2025. Mr.Sanjeev Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.Gaurav Pande, Ms.Varsha Thorat i/b Mr.Prashant Raut, for the Applicant/Intervenor (Original Complainant. Mr.S.S. Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State. ________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and N.S.Kamble learned Senior Counsel for the Intervenor.
The learned APP submit that statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. is recorded and he will produce the copy of the said statement on the next date of hearing.
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Intervention Application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Jan 2026. The bench was SHIVKUMAR DIGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.