Tashrif Sabir Beg @ Pailwan v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN 09:29:29 +0530 24th February 2026
Judgment
Tashrif Sabir Beg @ Pailwan …Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Tabish Mooman, for the Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Digambar Patil, PI attached to ANC Ghatkopar, present. CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. DATED: 24th FEBRUARY 2026 PC:-
At the outset, Ms. Megha Bajoria, learned APP representing the State in the matter, on instructions, states that charges are framed and compliance under Section 294 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been made by the prosecution. The next date before the Trial Court is 4th March 2026, on which date, recording of evidence is likely to commence. Ms. Bajoria, further states that the prosecution intends to examine only 10 witnesses. 24th February 2026 Shivgan 16-BA-3139-2025.doc
In view of the said statements, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, sought permission to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application after a period of six months if there is no substantial progress in the trial within the said period.
Permission to withdraw is granted with the aforesaid liberty.
Operative part
The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN 09:29:29 +0530 24th February 2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 294.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Feb 2026. The bench was NEELA GOKHALE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.